Code Review

review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+Code Review: TestProcessing-1
+Documentation:
+
+[NEEDS IMPROVEMENT] There are no comments explaining the program’s flow or intent.
+
+[IMPROVEMENT NEEDED] Variable usage and steps in the processing logic are undocumented, making the code harder to understand.
+
+Error Handling:
+
+[IMPROVEMENT NEEDED] There is no check for invalid file paths; the program crashes if sample.txt is missing or the path is incorrect.
+
+Naming/Structure:
+
+Variable names like z, q, a, s, t, and w are not descriptive. Using meaningful names would greatly improve code clarity.
+
+Logic is all contained within the static Main method, reducing readability and modularity.
+
+OOP Principles:
+
+The file reading and word processing logic are not encapsulated and could be moved into their own class or methods to follow object-oriented best practices.
+
+Output/Program Logic:
+
+Output is correct and displays word counts and unique words, but formatting is very basic and could be enhanced for readability.
+
+Suggestions
+Add summary and inline documentation to the code and use descriptive variable names.
+
+Implement checks and exception handling for missing or unreadable files.
+
+Refactor logic into separate methods or a dedicated class.
+
+Apply OOP principles, such as encapsulation, for better structure and maintainability.
+
+Consider improving output formatting (e.g., tabular display or alphabetical sorting).