ci: bump reviewer max-turns and add selective-read rule for large PRs#12
Merged
ci: bump reviewer max-turns and add selective-read rule for large PRs#12
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes two issues with the Claude reviewer observed on PR #11 (73-file archive removal):
--max-turns 8was enough for small PRs but ran out on a 73-file diff. Bumped to 20.Also added an explicit skip list:
skills/agentkey/references/, lock files, generated/vendored content — never Read those, they're noise.Expected behavior (this PR's own review)
This PR is 1 file, 12/5 line change. Should trigger STEP 2's Read-each path. Should post
✅ No issues foundwithin ~3 turns.Test plan
Note
Because this PR modifies
.github/workflows/claude-pr-review.yml, Claude Code GitHub App's security mechanism will refuse to run the reviewer on it (workflow diff-from-main guard). Expectreviewcheck to fail with "Workflow validation failed" — that's the security feature working, not a real failure. Merging anyway; from next PR onward the tuned version takes effect.