Skip to content

feat(plugin-jsdocs): log initializer and runner steps #1193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
matejchalk merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2025
Merged

feat(plugin-jsdocs): log initializer and runner steps #1193

matejchalk merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2025

Conversation

@matejchalk
Copy link
Collaborator

@matejchalk matejchalk commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Part of #888. Improves logs in the JSDocs plugin.

Examples

non-verbose

image

verbose

image

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 4f4633a

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many -t unit-test,int-test ✅ Succeeded 1m 52s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-19 11:25:42 UTC

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 4f4633a

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-19 10:28:33 UTC

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Open in StackBlitz

@code-pushup/ci

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/ci@1193

@code-pushup/cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/cli@1193

@code-pushup/core

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/core@1193

@code-pushup/create-cli

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/create-cli@1193

@code-pushup/models

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/models@1193

@code-pushup/nx-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/nx-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/axe-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/axe-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/coverage-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/coverage-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/eslint-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/js-packages-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/jsdocs-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/lighthouse-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/typescript-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/typescript-plugin@1193

@code-pushup/utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/code-pushup/cli/@code-pushup/utils@1193

commit: 4f4633a

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit c07c978 with previous commit 2e70bf4.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Performance 🔴 43 🔴 40 ↓ −2.9
Code coverage 🟡 89 🟡 89 ↑ +0.1
Documentation 🔴 35 🔴 35 ↓ −0.1
Axe Accessibility 🟡 88 🟡 88 ↓ −0.1
Bug prevention 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Code style 🟢 99 🟢 99 –
Security 🔴 43 🔴 43 –
Updates 🟡 71 🟡 71 –
Type Safety 🟡 56 🟡 56 –
Miscellaneous 🟡 67 🟡 67 –
Accessibility 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
Best Practices 🟢 100 🟢 100 –
SEO 🟢 92 🟢 92 –
👍 1 group improved, 👎 2 groups regressed, 👍 4 audits improved, 👎 4 audits regressed, 16 audits changed without impacting score

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Lighthouse Performance 🔴 43 🔴 40 ↓ −2.9
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟡 89 🟡 89 ↑ +0.1
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🔴 35 🔴 35 ↓ −0.1

31 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Lighthouse Speed Index 🟨 5.5 s 🟥 10.3 s ↑ +87.5 %
Lighthouse Total Blocking Time 🟥 1,050 ms 🟥 840 ms ↓ −20.5 %
Lighthouse Max Potential First Input Delay 🟥 770 ms 🟥 480 ms ↓ −37.6 %
Lighthouse First Contentful Paint 🟥 3.0 s 🟥 3.4 s ↑ +10.5 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 90.5 % 🟩 90.6 % ↑ +0.2 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 577 undocumented functions 🟥 581 undocumented functions ↑ +0.7 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 84.6 % 🟨 84.6 % ↑ +0.1 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 260 undocumented variables 🟥 261 undocumented variables ↑ +0.4 %
Lighthouse Avoids enormous network payloads 🟩 Total size was 2,059 KiB 🟩 Total size was 2,065 KiB ↑ +0.3 %
Lighthouse Initial server response time was short 🟥 Root document took 620 ms 🟥 Root document took 3,890 ms ↑ +524.2 %
Lighthouse Largest Contentful Paint 🟥 10.9 s 🟥 9.6 s ↓ −11.8 %
Lighthouse JavaScript execution time 🟥 2.8 s 🟥 2.1 s ↓ −23.7 %
Lighthouse Minimizes main-thread work 🟥 6.6 s 🟥 6.0 s ↓ −7.8 %
Lighthouse Server Backend Latencies 🟩 1,180 ms 🟩 1,510 ms ↑ +28.2 %
Lighthouse Uses efficient cache policy on static assets 🟨 30 resources found 🟨 30 resources found ↓ −0.1 %
Lighthouse Time to Interactive 🟥 12.3 s 🟥 12.2 s ↓ −1 %
Lighthouse Metrics 🟩 100% 🟩 100% ↓ −1 %
Lighthouse Network Round Trip Times 🟩 10 ms 🟩 30 ms ↑ +375.4 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused CSS 🟥 Potential savings of 95 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 95 KiB ↑ +4.3 %
Lighthouse Reduce unused JavaScript 🟥 Potential savings of 190 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 190 KiB ↑ +2.2 %
Lighthouse Remove duplicate modules in JavaScript bundles 🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB 🟥 Potential savings of 105 KiB ↑ +4.3 %
TypeScript Semantic errors 🟥 2599 errors 🟥 2602 errors ↑ +0.1 %
Lighthouse Avoids an excessive DOM size 🟥 2,357 elements 🟥 2,356 elements ↓ −0.1 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 87.2 % 🟨 87.2 % ↓ −0.1 %

655 other audits are unchanged.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Code PushUp

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions – compared current commit c07c978 with previous commit 2e70bf4.

💼 Project plugin-jsdocs

😟 Code PushUp report has regressed.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Documentation 🟡 86 🟡 83 ↓ −2.7
Code coverage 🟢 96 🟢 95 ↓ −0.5

4 other categories are unchanged.

👎 2 groups regressed, 👎 4 audits regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 86 🟡 83 ↓ −2.7
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 96 🟢 95 ↓ −0.5

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟨 2 undocumented functions 🟨 5 undocumented functions ↑ +150 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 92.6 % 🟩 90.5 % ↓ −2.3 %
JSDocs coverage Variables coverage 🟥 9 undocumented variables 🟥 10 undocumented variables ↑ +11.1 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟨 88.8 % 🟨 87.9 % ↓ −1 %

440 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project plugin-coverage

🥳 Code PushUp report has improved.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟡 88 🟡 89 ↑ +1.8
Documentation 🟡 69 🟡 69 ↑ +0.2

4 other categories are unchanged.

👍 2 groups improved, 👍 3 audits improved

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟡 88 🟡 89 ↑ +1.8
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🟡 69 🟡 69 ↑ +0.2

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Function coverage 🟨 87.9 % 🟩 90.6 % ↑ +3.1 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 84.3 % 🟨 85.7 % ↑ +1.6 %
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 23 undocumented functions 🟥 22 undocumented functions ↓ −4.3 %

441 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project utils

🤨 Code PushUp report has both improvements and regressions.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↑ +0.1
Documentation 🔴 38 🔴 38 ↓ −0.1

4 other categories are unchanged.

👍 1 group improved, 👎 1 group regressed, 👍 3 audits improved, 👎 1 audit regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 95 🟢 95 ↑ +0.1
JSDocs coverage Documentation coverage 🔴 38 🔴 38 ↓ −0.1

13 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
JSDocs coverage Functions coverage 🟥 234 undocumented functions 🟥 236 undocumented functions ↑ +0.9 %
Code coverage Function coverage 🟩 95.5 % 🟩 95.5 % ↑ +0.1 %
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 92 % 🟩 92 % ↑ +0.1 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟩 96.9 % 🟩 96.9 % ↑ +0.1 %

440 other audits are unchanged.

💼 Project plugin-lighthouse

😟 Code PushUp report has regressed.

🕵️ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal 🔍

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage 🟢 99 🟢 99 ↓ −0.1

5 other categories are unchanged.

👎 1 group regressed, 👎 1 audit regressed

🗃️ Groups

🔌 Plugin 🗃️ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score 🔄 Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟢 99 🟢 99 ↓ −0.1

14 other groups are unchanged.

🛡️ Audits

🔌 Plugin 🛡️ Audit 📏 Previous value 📏 Current value 🔄 Value change
Code coverage Branch coverage 🟩 96.1 % 🟩 96 % ↓ −0.1 %

443 other audits are unchanged.

10 other projects are unchanged.

@matejchalk matejchalk marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 11:15
@matejchalk matejchalk merged commit 18db831 into main Dec 20, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@matejchalk matejchalk deleted the jsdocs-logs branch December 20, 2025 13:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@BioPhoton BioPhoton BioPhoton approved these changes

@vmasek vmasek Awaiting requested review from vmasek

@hanna-skryl hanna-skryl Awaiting requested review from hanna-skryl

Assignees

@matejchalk matejchalk

Labels

🧩 coverage-plugin 🧩 jsdocs-plugin 🔬 testing writing tests 🧩 utils

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@matejchalk @BioPhoton