PDJB-306: Add marked joint landlord flag#1406
Merged
samyou-softwire merged 3 commits intoJun 4, 2026
Merged
Conversation
56a3d1e to
234db1e
Compare
234db1e to
d94b209
Compare
TomHanmer29
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2026
Contributor
TomHanmer29
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks sensible to me! I think false by default is a good state for this to be in
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket number
PDJB-306 (and others in the future)
Goal of change
adds a database column that tracks whether the user indicated this is a JL property
right now filled in from the outcome of this question on the registration journey
this will be used later on for designs where the landlord needs to specifically state later on that the property has no joint landlords
Description of main change(s)
adds database column
adds hooks into the journey flow to populate it
For reviewer
nothing here except the population of the field is feature flagged. I think this is fine as the default 'false' will be true for any registrations made before we turn on JL
Checklist
Delete any that are not applicable, and add explanation below for any that are applicable but haven't been done
and any related functionality)
mention that here