Tracking issue for the current jmsfx roadmap. Individual issues have the real detail; this is the map.
1. Unit tests (top priority)
Across all 7 reactor modules there is currently exactly one `@Test` method total, and it's `@Ignore`d - effectively zero automated test coverage anywhere.
2. Dependency updates
3. jmsfx-creator - mostly functional, missing its headline feature
4. jmsfx-editor - currently a data model with no application on top
5. jmsfx-server - real functional gaps in what looks like working code
Suggested rough sequencing
Tests (#1/#2) and the safe dependency updates (#4) can happen anytime and in parallel - they don't block or depend on anything else. The Spring Boot decision (#3) should land before or alongside the jmsfx-server functional fixes (#9/#10), since #10's architecture change touches the same controller code #9's fixes do. jmsfx-creator (#5/#6) and jmsfx-editor (#7/#8) are independent of each other and of the server work.
Tracking issue for the current jmsfx roadmap. Individual issues have the real detail; this is the map.
1. Unit tests (top priority)
Across all 7 reactor modules there is currently exactly one `@Test` method total, and it's `@Ignore`d - effectively zero automated test coverage anywhere.
2. Dependency updates
3. jmsfx-creator - mostly functional, missing its headline feature
4. jmsfx-editor - currently a data model with no application on top
5. jmsfx-server - real functional gaps in what looks like working code
Suggested rough sequencing
Tests (#1/#2) and the safe dependency updates (#4) can happen anytime and in parallel - they don't block or depend on anything else. The Spring Boot decision (#3) should land before or alongside the jmsfx-server functional fixes (#9/#10), since #10's architecture change touches the same controller code #9's fixes do. jmsfx-creator (#5/#6) and jmsfx-editor (#7/#8) are independent of each other and of the server work.