Is there an existing issue for this?
Problem Statement
Currently when you go to the manual mapping page you see the entities listed according to the end of their IRI (for instance if the full IRI is https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00000003 it will display as ont00000003). This makes development cumbersome when you are attempting to map ontologies like BFO or CCO that don't use human readable IRIs.
Proposed Solution
If an entity has a rdfs label associated display that label as well as the IRI to ease development.
Area
Mapping (Manual / SparkSQL)
Additional Context
No response
Is there an existing issue for this?
Problem Statement
Currently when you go to the manual mapping page you see the entities listed according to the end of their IRI (for instance if the full IRI is https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00000003 it will display as ont00000003). This makes development cumbersome when you are attempting to map ontologies like BFO or CCO that don't use human readable IRIs.
Proposed Solution
If an entity has a rdfs label associated display that label as well as the IRI to ease development.
Area
Mapping (Manual / SparkSQL)
Additional Context
No response