Issue 105 add a robust fallback handler when translation keys are missing in localized files

[IKSHITSINHA77]

Pull Request — AgroDex

Thank you for contributing to Agro Dex!
Please fill out the following details to help us review your PR efficiently.

---

📌 Related Issue

Fixes #105

---

Implement a robust fallback g r missing transaction keys in localised files.

---

Type of Change

• 🐛 Bug Fix

---

📸 Screenshots / Video

Attach visuals if your PR affects the UI or layout.

---

✅ Checklist

• I’ve read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines.
• My code follows the project’s conventions.
• I’ve linked the related issue correctly.
• I’ve tested my changes locally.
• I’ve added or updated documentation/comments if needed.
• My PR title follows the branch & commit naming conventions.
• My changes introduce no new warnings or errors.
• I’ve performed a self-review of my work.

---

💬 Additional Notes (Optional)

Add any context, dependencies, or questions for reviewers.

[vercel]

@IKSHITSINHA77 is attempting to deploy a commit to the daviddprtma's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[daviddprtma]

hey man @IKSHITSINHA77 what are you doing?? you committed with README.md? it is not related with the PR that you opened to your issue in #105 . please revert all your commit and make sure that you're commit in the right task. it's not who fast who'll get merge but the diligent and solver-maker are the priority in this SSOC'26 event. hope you understand it. thanks.

[IKSHITSINHA77]

Subject: Apology and Request for Reconsideration Hello @daviddprtma, I sincerely apologize for the mistake I made regarding my contribution. I am new to open-source contributions and SSOC, and I misunderstood the scope of the assigned issue. At the time, I was also occupied with my examinations, which affected my attention to the project requirements. However, I understand that this is not an excuse for submitting unrelated changes. Thank you for pointing out my mistake and explaining the importance of working on the correct task. I appreciate your guidance and the opportunity to learn from this experience. I will immediately revert the unrelated commits, make the required adjustments, carefully review the issue requirements again, and submit the correct work. I assure you that I will be more diligent and attentive in future contributions. Thank you for your patience and understanding. I am eager to learn and contribute properly to the project. Kind regards, Ikshit Sinha GitHub: @IKSHITSINHA77

…

On Wed, 24 Jun, 2026, 08:40 David Pratama, ***@***.***> wrote: *daviddprtma* left a comment (daviddprtma/AgroDex#174) <#174 (comment)> hey man @IKSHITSINHA77 <https://github.com/IKSHITSINHA77> what are you doing?? you committed with README.md? it is not related with the PR that you opened to your issue in #105 <#105> . please revert all your commit and make sure that you're commit in the right task. it's not who fast who'll get merge but the diligent and solver-maker are the priority in this SSOC'26 event. hope you understand it. thanks. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#174?email_source=notifications&email_token=BTJ3MUZNETF75KCPNKMMTXT5BNBC5A5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTINZYGU2TEOJSG4Z2M4TFMFZW63VHNVSW45DJN5XKKZLWMVXHJLDGN5XXIZLSL5RWY2LDNM#issuecomment-4785529273>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BTJ3MU7KNB5JAB6BX4IU2V35BNBC5AVCNFSNUABGKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMYTAOJTHEZDQMJYGQ5US43TOVSTWNBXGIZTEOBYGU4DTILWAI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[daviddprtma]

okay. do the best for your next work👍