Skip to content

docs: name the three open soundness holes - #214

Merged
the-homeless-god merged 1 commit into
devfrom
a/description-names-the-open-soundness-holes
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

the-homeless-god merged 1 commit into
devfrom
a/description-names-the-open-soundness-holes

Conversation

@the-homeless-god

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • docs: name the three open soundness holes

Verified on the tree of dev plus this branch (e1cd002): the checker test set passes, the provability verdict is green with all four checks, the proved-share ledger and the rule tables agree with the tree, pre-push is green, commit messages follow the convention.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The register of known soundness violations listed two; three more were
found this week (theorem hypotheses not discharged, a loop through a
function value, a restricted postcondition cited without its
restriction). DESCRIPTION now names them in its limits, says that its
syllogism example states the premise by definition, and mentions the
script.* lines of .flangrc.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PNHrA3rG7FTWhB11E7pjDQ
@the-homeless-god
the-homeless-god merged commit eb61db4 into dev Oct 1, 2026
27 checks passed
@the-homeless-god
the-homeless-god deleted the a/description-names-the-open-soundness-holes branch October 1, 2026 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant