Skip to content

autoresume: persist starting timeout when it exists#1900

Open
matthewlouisbrockman wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
timeout-persisted-on-resume-eng-3483
Open

autoresume: persist starting timeout when it exists#1900
matthewlouisbrockman wants to merge 17 commits intomainfrom
timeout-persisted-on-resume-eng-3483

Conversation

@matthewlouisbrockman
Copy link
Contributor

@matthewlouisbrockman matthewlouisbrockman commented Feb 12, 2026

  • Persist startingTimeout in paused snapshot config
  • AutoResume uses the startingtimeout for the newtimeout if it exists instead of using the 5 minutes default

Decision:

  • Sandbox startingTimeout is always set to the timeout of the sandbox when it was first created now instead of being not-set. This enables consistent behavior between first usage and later auto-resume usage as opposed to a new timeout on auto-resume.
  • The SDK has a default of 5 minutes for the timeout anyway, so it's unlikely that the sandbox ever doesn't get a timeout in the create unless someone's not using the SDK.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 4349b95137

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@matthewlouisbrockman matthewlouisbrockman marked this pull request as draft February 12, 2026 03:43
@matthewlouisbrockman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: fc25579b9c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@matthewlouisbrockman
Copy link
Contributor Author

actually closing it for now

@matthewlouisbrockman matthewlouisbrockman marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2026 21:47
@matthewlouisbrockman matthewlouisbrockman added the improvement Improvement for current functionality label Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

improvement Improvement for current functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants