Skip to content

[TASK] Identify and remove obsolete workflows - #224

Open
RamakrishnanPK wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
bgsw-contrib:cleanup-obsolete-workflow-dev
Open

RamakrishnanPK wants to merge 2 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
bgsw-contrib:cleanup-obsolete-workflow-dev

Conversation

@RamakrishnanPK

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #218

@AlexanderLanin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@RamakrishnanPK there is a conflict unfortunately which only you can resolve since its a protected branch

@pawelrutkaq

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@PiotrKorkus

@pawelrutkaq

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

did we submit prs to all consumers off thos workflows in score that are not pinned to stable sha?

@AlexanderLanin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah, months ago

@MaximilianSoerenPollak MaximilianSoerenPollak left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not quiet sure where you found that these workflows are obsolete.
They are still being used by repositories.

The template-sync one and the score-pr-checks might be able to be deleted but require further questioning to infrastructure slack channel or mcp_server maintainers.


Edit:

I just saw the issue that this is suppose to fix.
So then this vital piece of information is missing here as well. Is the old check covered by the new on-pr and if so with what mechanism?
Cause if we now for example force repos to have pre-commit I'm unsure if this will be very popular or accepted and they most likely will want to hold on to the old ones.

Comment thread .github/workflows/bzlmod-lock-check.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/copyright.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/docs-verify.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/format.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/score-pr-checks.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/template-sync.yml
@AlexanderLanin

AlexanderLanin commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@MaximilianSoerenPollak any updates?

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin moved this from in review to On Hold in INF - Infrastructure Community Sep 8, 2026
@AlexanderLanin

AlexanderLanin commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Current Eclipse SCORE @main consumers

Current reusable-workflow references to eclipse-score/cicd-workflows/...@main on the repositories’ default branches:

Repository Current @main workflow references Pinning PR
logging bzlmod-lock-check.yml, copyright.yml, docs-cleanup.yml, format.yml, daily.yml, license-check.yml, qnx-build.yml #302 (all except qnx-build.yml)

The PR pins the listed reusable-workflow references to commit 37eaadadfefc263d94a858d25665735659e916fa.

@AlexanderLanin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@RamakrishnanPK can you resolve merge conflicts please, I think we are ready

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: On Hold

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

identify and remove obsolete workflows

4 participants