Replace git clone spack-packages with spack repo add command#30
Open
Replace git clone spack-packages with spack repo add command#30
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
This PR turns out to be harder than anticipated. When using This has been passed to the spack team as a suggestion. |
Contributor
Author
|
We may be able to do this with a |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
This PR modifies the way the spack-package repo is added to the container. Instead of putting the repo in the container with a specific
git clone, we now use the newspack repo addcommand which retains the information that this is a repository and which then supportsspack repo update. When spack only knows of a directory (previous situation), there is nothing to update.What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
No.
Does this PR change default behavior?
No.