skills: add accounts-receivable-advanced stub (02-org-100-to-1k)#5
Merged
Conversation
Resolves the only orphan composes: reference across the entire appskills catalog. erphq/appskills/apps/020-02-fin-invoicing-ar.md references finance-accounting/accounts-receivable-advanced but no SKILL.md existed at any size tier. This commit ships a stub at the canonical path (02-org-100-to-1k tier per the app's own size_tier frontmatter) that captures: - Correct frontmatter (matches the sibling accounts-receivable skill at this tier in shape; differentiated description) - The 19-table inventory sourced from the app spec's ## Composed Skills bullet, with column-level details deferred to the app spec - Explicit "stub" marker at the top of the body - TODO checklist for the standard SKILL.md sections (Build / Maintain / Scale / By Industry / ERP•AI & Proto / Related) that need domain-expert authorship Goal: unblock build-time composes: expansion in downstream tools (lab-sites was hitting this when running its skills-drift checker), and give the maintainer a structured starting point to flesh out the deeper content. Differentiator vs. the existing accounts-receivable skill at the same tier: this is the standalone-invoicing-app form (branded templates, recurring billing, formal dunning, dispute mgmt, collections cases, write-offs, late fees, credit holds) — not the AR-as-sub-module-within-books form. Per the app spec, typical fit is a US mid-market company that has outgrown sub-module AR. Closes #4
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #4
Resolves the only orphan `composes:` reference across the entire erphq/appskills catalog. `apps/020-02-fin-invoicing-ar.md` composes `finance-accounting/accounts-receivable-advanced` but no SKILL.md existed for it at any size tier.
What ships
A stub SKILL.md at the canonical path:
```
departments/finance-accounting/02-org-100-to-1k/accounts-receivable-advanced/SKILL.md
```
(02-org-100-to-1k tier per the app's own `size_tier` frontmatter.)
The stub:
Why a stub vs. a full write-up
Writing the full Build/Maintain/Scale content for an advanced AR engine requires domain expertise I don't have. The minimum viable change is:
When the deeper content lands, this stub gets replaced — version field bumped from `0.1.0` to `1.0.0`.
Verification
Spec aware
Surfaced during work on erphq/lab-sites#118, which built the appskills+skills→lab-sites pipeline and ran a full `composes:` resolution audit across all 71 apps and 62 unique skill references.