docs: Revise README content and improve package description and documentation#46
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideRefines the NuGet package’s public documentation by expanding the root README with clearer behavior/usage details, adding sections on scope and requirements, and introducing a package-level README under src that mirrors and tailors the documentation for the published package view. File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 22 minutes and 18 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- The root README and the package README contain largely duplicated content; consider consolidating this into a single source (e.g., generate the package README from the root README or share a common fragment) to avoid future drift.
- The Requirements section hardcodes
.NET SDK 10.0.xand10.0.102, which may become stale; consider phrasing this in terms of theglobal.jsonconfiguration or omitting the exact version to reduce future maintenance overhead.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The root README and the package README contain largely duplicated content; consider consolidating this into a single source (e.g., generate the package README from the root README or share a common fragment) to avoid future drift.
- The Requirements section hardcodes `.NET SDK 10.0.x` and `10.0.102`, which may become stale; consider phrasing this in terms of the `global.json` configuration or omitting the exact version to reduce future maintenance overhead.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Code Review SummaryStatus: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Files Reviewed (2 files)
Reviewed by laguna-m.1-20260312:free · 450,853 tokens |
Closes #45
Summary by Sourcery
Revise and expand the package documentation for Escendit.Tools.Branding to clearly describe its behavior as a development-only branding tool and how it configures MSBuild properties and assets for consuming projects.
Documentation: