Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 25, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update stylelint-config-rational-order to the latest version 🚀#32

Open
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
greenkeeper/stylelint-config-rational-order-0.1.0
Open

Update stylelint-config-rational-order to the latest version 🚀#32
greenkeeper[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
greenkeeper/stylelint-config-rational-order-0.1.0

Conversation

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper Bot commented Apr 11, 2019

The devDependency stylelint-config-rational-order was updated from 0.0.2 to 0.1.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Find out more about this release.

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

greenkeeper Bot commented Apr 15, 2019

Update to this version instead 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 8 commits.

  • 879b3d7 bump version
  • 21124d1 move border-*-color prop before border-*-width
  • e1233c5 add object-fit & object-position props to box model group
  • 781de0a - add mix-blend-mode and isolation props to visual group
  • ac29b7c add content propriety to misc group
  • 35b4e6f improve grids & flex props order
  • 22188e5 move 'grid-column-start' before 'grid-column-end'
  • 5da5231 add answer to the question why this config should be used #9

See the full diff

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

greenkeeper Bot commented Apr 18, 2019

Update to this version instead 🚀

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants