Skip to content

fix: add Terraform provider monitoring to Dependabot#7

Merged
gamaware merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/add-terraform-dependabot
Mar 28, 2026
Merged

fix: add Terraform provider monitoring to Dependabot#7
gamaware merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/add-terraform-dependabot

Conversation

@gamaware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add Terraform ecosystem to Dependabot configuration for automated provider version monitoring

Test plan

  • Verify Dependabot picks up Terraform provider dependencies
  • Confirm weekly schedule works alongside existing GitHub Actions monitoring

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 28, 2026 05:24
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gamaware has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 16 minutes and 49 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9c566048-306f-40fb-9e22-dcd6202f6b52

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7327a49 and 18c30c0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/dependabot.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/add-terraform-dependabot

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gamaware gamaware merged commit d1e9fcd into main Mar 28, 2026
12 checks passed
@gamaware gamaware deleted the fix/add-terraform-dependabot branch March 28, 2026 05:25

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a Dependabot entry intended to monitor Terraform provider versions alongside the existing GitHub Actions dependency checks.

Changes:

  • Extend .github/dependabot.yml with a new package-ecosystem: "terraform" update rule.
  • Configure the Terraform updates to run on a weekly schedule.

Comment thread .github/dependabot.yml
Comment on lines +10 to +14
# Terraform providers
- package-ecosystem: "terraform"
directory: "/"
schedule:
interval: "weekly"

Copilot AI Mar 28, 2026

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The repo currently doesn’t contain any committed Terraform configuration files (*.tf / *.tf.json), so Dependabot’s terraform updater won’t find dependency files in directory: "/" (it only scans real Terraform files, not HCL snippets embedded in Markdown). This means the new entry likely won’t achieve the stated goal and may show Dependabot “no dependency files found” errors.

Consider either (a) removing this entry until Terraform code is added to the repo, or (b) pointing directory to the actual path where Terraform files are checked in (and adding open-pull-requests-limit if you want parity with the existing GitHub Actions entry).

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants