Contradicting Licensing

[microalps]

• CDNJS notes that this is licensed under MIT or BSD
• jquery.easing.js has a header that notes BSD
• jquery.easing.compatibility.js has a header that notes MIT
• Standard LICENSE file that GitHub recognizes does not exist
• LICENSE-BSD-3-Clause.txt Notes that there are two parts to the code - "EASING EQUATIONS" is from another author and is MIT/BSD and "jQuery Easing", this library, is BSD only.

Can the contradictions be cleared up? I'm not professing to have legal knowledge, but once you've taken an MIT license and incorporated it into a more restrictive license, the MIT license is essentially irrelevant. The resulting product is NOT licensed under MIT.

[gdsmith]

I think the confusion is around the fact the equations are under a separate licence from the plugin code itself, any idea how to properly tidy this up