Mention runtime MCP enforcement with Armorer Guard#9
Open
armorer-labs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a short note that preflight MCP security scores can be complemented with runtime enforcement.
Armorer Guard is listed as one example because it can wrap stdio MCP servers with a local proxy and inspect
tools/callarguments for prompt injection, credential disclosure, exfiltration, and destructive action risk before execution.I kept this as a small explanatory note rather than adding Armorer Guard as a scanned MCP server, since it is a runtime proxy/guard rather than a normal MCP server catalog entry.