Add msgpackc to the NAMES; fixes #551#554
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refines the project's CMake configuration by expanding the search criteria for the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds msgpackc as a possible name for the msgpack-c package in the CMake build script. This improves compatibility with systems where the package is installed under that name. However, the change as-is is incomplete and will likely cause build failures, because the surrounding logic does not account for the different target name (msgpackc) that this package is likely to provide. I've left a comment with a suggestion to make the package finding and linking more robust.
No description provided.