-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Linux x86 64 -> Linux aarch64 cross builds #267
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
yuriivcs
merged 16 commits into
google-ml-infra:main
from
yuriivcs:linux_x86_64_to_linux_aarch64_ext
May 21, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
112a8e4
Add Linux aarch64 libs
yuriivcs 3935155
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 8dcf207
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 3c40c4a
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 8464e68
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs d306e6d
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs a3d5a8c
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 828c52a
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 7fda5cb
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:yuriivcs/rules_ml_toolchain
yuriivcs 7e315f6
Update Linux aarch64 configuration
yuriivcs 7a47c71
Create BUILD file for all needed architectures
yuriivcs 2485ba4
Add libc++ static linking and more tests for cross compilation
yuriivcs 41d8543
Remove unused TSAN / ASAN support
yuriivcs 9ff20f5
Merge branch 'google-ml-infra:main' into linux_x86_64_to_linux_aarch6…
yuriivcs 58986ce
Update README.md file
yuriivcs ef92995
Merge branch 'linux_x86_64_to_linux_aarch64_ext' of github.com:yuriiv…
yuriivcs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just want to double check that if the ID here is correct or not? Asking since I thought we'd remove x86_64 in the naming, but totally fine if that's intentional.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, It's correct. I've changed the ID because we use the same convention for other toolchains' identifier. For example:
toolchain_linux_aarch64_linux_aarch64_id
toolchain_linux_x86_64_linux_x86_64_id