fix: cover common credential forms - #9
Merged
Conversation
Agent: Hostus
Contributor
Author
|
[REVIEW] GO — #9 @ 398b13c — lens: correctness+security+gates, reviewer Hostus (1 of 1) Focused re-review scope: the single P1 named on #8 at 000d6fb, its remediation, and direct regressions only. Named defect verification:
Commands and gates:
Blocking P0/P1 findings: none remain in the focused remediation scope. Non-blocking follow-ups: none. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
passassignment keys such asDB_PASSin local-content redactionContext
PR #8 merged as
fcbce00333c3d05b4a9da206ad979579adf45a37before the independentNO_GOreview comment was posted. The merged tree exactly matches reviewed head000d6fb720bbea0d3db3ce669fcba081cd1aacba, so this hotfix carries the named P1 remediation forward from currentmain.Verification
bun run typecheck: exit 0bun run test: exit 0, 279 pass, 0 fail, 753 expect() callsshield review: exit 0, no security issues foundFollow-up to #8.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.