docs: update project memory and cycle log after Kimchi setup

[hieuck]

Updates the Kimchi project memory files after merging #61 and records the cycle log.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@hieuck, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 14 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8df8cc9b-8df1-44d8-a631-5dfcddf4d248

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 59888c2 and 43d8138.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .kimchi/logs/2026-07-08-cycle.md
• .kimchi/memory/context.md
• .kimchi/memory/conventions.md
• .kimchi/memory/known-issues.md
• .kimchi/memory/workstreams.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/update-memory-after-kimchi-setup

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[ecc-tools]

Analyzing 200 commits...

[ecc-tools]

Analysis Complete

Generated ECC bundle from 1 commits | Confidence: 50%

View Pull Request #63

Repository Profile

Attribute	Value
Language	TypeScript
Framework	Not detected
Commit Convention	conventional
Test Directory	separate

Changed Files (5)

Metric	Value
Files changed	5
Additions	70
Deletions	72

Top hotspots

Path	Status	+/-
.kimchi/memory/context.md	modified	+16 / -46
.kimchi/logs/2026-07-08-cycle.md	added	+30 / -0
.kimchi/memory/conventions.md	modified	+9 / -17
.kimchi/memory/known-issues.md	modified	+12 / -6
.kimchi/memory/workstreams.md	modified	+3 / -3

Top directories

Directory	Files	Total changes
.kimchi/memory	4	112
.kimchi/logs	1	30

Analysis Depth Readiness (commit-history, 7%)

ECC Tools uses this to decide whether recommendations should stay at commit-history/setup guidance or expand into CI, security, harness, reference-set, AI-routing, and team backlog work.

Area	Status	Evidence / Next Step
Commit history	Partial	1 commits sampled
CI/CD signals	Missing	Add workflow files or CI troubleshooting evidence so ECC Tools can reason about pipeline setup.
Security evidence	Missing	Add AgentShield, audit, SARIF, SBOM, or security review evidence so recommendations can cover security posture.
Harness configuration	Missing	Add Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Zed, dmux, MCP, plugin, or cross-harness config evidence for harness-agnostic recommendations.
Reference/eval evidence	Missing	Add fixtures, golden traces, reference sets, or evaluator benchmarks so deeper recommendations have regression evidence.
AI routing and cost controls	Missing	Add model-routing, budget, usage, or cost-control files before relying on AI-heavy automation recommendations.
Team handoff and project tracking	Missing	Add roadmap, runbook, project, Linear, or follow-up tracking docs so generated work can land in a team queue.

Reference Set Readiness (0/7, 0%)

Area	Status	Evidence / Next Step
Deep analyzer corpus	Missing	Add analyzer fixture, golden, benchmark, or reference-set files that can catch analyzer regressions.
RAG/evaluator comparison	Missing	Add retrieval or evaluator reference-set comparison fixtures with expected ranking behavior.
PR salvage/review corpus	Missing	Add stale-PR, review-thread, reopen-flow, or salvage reference cases for queue cleanup automation.
Discussion triage corpus	Missing	Add public discussion triage fixtures, golden cases, or reference sets for informational, answered, and no-response classifications.
Harness compatibility	Missing	Add cross-harness, adapter-compliance, or harness-audit evidence for Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Zed, dmux, and agent surfaces.
Security evidence	Missing	Attach security evidence such as SBOMs, SARIF, audit reports, or AgentShield evidence packs.
CI failure-mode evidence	Missing	Add captured CI failure logs, dry-run fixtures, or troubleshooting docs for common workflow failure modes.

Generated Instincts (16)

Domain	Count
git	4
code-style	9
testing	2
architecture	1

After merging, import with:

/instinct-import .claude/homunculus/instincts/inherited/KeePassBrowserBridge-instincts.yaml

Files

• .claude/ecc-tools.json
• .claude/skills/KeePassBrowserBridge/SKILL.md
• .agents/skills/KeePassBrowserBridge/SKILL.md
• .agents/skills/KeePassBrowserBridge/agents/openai.yaml
• .claude/identity.json
• .codex/config.toml
• .codex/AGENTS.md
• .codex/agents/explorer.toml
• .codex/agents/reviewer.toml
• .codex/agents/docs-researcher.toml
• .claude/homunculus/instincts/inherited/KeePassBrowserBridge-instincts.yaml

---

_{ECC Tools | Everything Claude Code}