Skip to content

fix: broken filepaths in readme#169

Merged
ankumar merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix_readme
Apr 4, 2025
Merged

fix: broken filepaths in readme#169
ankumar merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix_readme

Conversation

@abhijitjavelin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@abhijitjavelin abhijitjavelin requested a review from ankumar April 4, 2025 03:31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @abhijitjavelin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses broken filepaths in the README.md file. It corrects the links to several example files, ensuring they point to the correct locations within the repository. Specifically, it updates the paths for asynchronous, synchronous, and drop-in replacement examples, as well as document processing and RAG implementation examples.

Highlights

  • Filepath Correction: The primary focus is fixing incorrect filepaths in the README.md file to ensure example links are valid.
  • Example Link Updates: Several example links have been updated to reflect the correct locations of the example files within the repository structure.

Changelog

  • README.md
    • Updated filepaths for asynchronous, synchronous, and drop-in replacement examples to point to the examples/route_examples/ directory.
    • Updated filepath for document processing example to point to examples/gemini/document_processing.py.
    • Updated filepath for RAG implementation example to point to examples/rag/javelin_rag_embeddings_demo.ipynb.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A link astray,
A path obscured from view,
Now clarity reigns.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses broken filepaths in the README, improving the usability and navigability of the documentation. The changes appear straightforward and correct.

Merge Readiness

The pull request appears to correctly address the broken filepaths in the README. Given the straightforward nature of the changes and the absence of any identified issues at the medium, high, or critical severity levels, the pull request seems ready for merging. However, I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and it should be reviewed and approved by others before merging.

@ankumar ankumar merged commit 2c085d5 into main Apr 4, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants