Skip to content

fix(ci): relock github/codeql-action at v4.38.2 so codeql.yml starts - #105

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/actions-lock-codeql-4.38.2
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/actions-lock-codeql-4.38.2

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Why

#103 bumped codeql.yml to github/codeql-action@v4.38.2, but .github/workflows/actions.lock (the native Actions lockfile, which dependabot does not update) still pinned v4.38.0. Since merge 97ffa9d every codeql.yml run on main is a startup_failure with the annotation Invalid lockfile: .github/workflows/actions.lock#L1 (run 37046729552), i.e. jobs=0 and no check-run at all. The parent 9a1067a ran green on 2026-10-01.

What

Regenerated the lock entry with the authoritative tool:

gh actions-lock .github/workflows/codeql.yml
  • github/codeql-action@v4.38.0 → @v4.38.2 (2892aa5e19bbd11bc0cff5427e3b750a04d9e3c2)
  • the tool also pruned nine SHA-keyed dependency entries (actions/cache, actions/checkout@3d3c…, actions/upload-artifact@043f…, denoland/setup-deno, dtolnay/rust-toolchain, editorconfig-checker, erlef/setup-beam, ossf/scorecard-action, webfactory/ssh-agent) that no workflows: list, no workflow file and no transitive uses: edge references. Measured before accepting: 0 references each; the new lock is transitively closed (9 entries, 3 edges, 0 unresolved) and gh actions-lock --no-fix --json reports valid: true.

No workflow file changes.

Verification after merge

The first codeql.yml run on the merge SHA must not be startup_failure (actions/runs?head_sha=<merge>).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01F1dMuLprAVdZyYPLwZ4t8q

Deferred red checks (non-required; standing ruling 2026-09-15)

#103 bumped codeql.yml to github/codeql-action@v4.38.2 but
.github/workflows/actions.lock still pinned v4.38.0, so every codeql.yml
run on main since 97ffa9d dies at startup ("Invalid lockfile", jobs=0;
run 37046729552). Dependabot does not update the native lockfile.

Regenerated with `gh actions-lock .github/workflows/codeql.yml`. The tool
also pruned nine dependency entries that no workflow list, workflow file
or transitive `uses:` edge references; the result is transitively closed
and `gh actions-lock --no-fix` reports valid.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01F1dMuLprAVdZyYPLwZ4t8q
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/actions.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: b230b932-7139-4d80-af48-59d10a929627

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Pull request is closed - (🔄 Check again to try again)
  • Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Autopilot is currently an internal CodeRabbit preview.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 3540cc0 into main Oct 2, 2026
23 of 26 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Autopilot could not be updated. Open Coding to check access and billing.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/actions-lock-codeql-4.38.2 branch October 2, 2026 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant