Skip to content

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs - #75

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/sha-pin-actions

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

fix(ci): pin third-party actions to full commit SHAs

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — startup_failure, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. actions/checkout@<sha> # v4.

dtolnay/rust-toolchain takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit with: toolchain: input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.

The account's Actions policy requires a full-length SHA ref. A tag or branch ref is refused at
startup — `startup_failure`, no jobs, "this workflow graph cannot be shown" — so these workflows
could not run at all. This resolves each ref to the commit it currently points at and records the
ref in a trailing comment, e.g. `actions/checkout@<sha> # v4`.

`dtolnay/rust-toolchain` takes its toolchain from the ref itself, so those steps also gained an
explicit `with: toolchain:` input; without it, a SHA ref would silently lose the channel.

No behaviour is intended to change beyond the pins.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 4b0feb65-b820-4502-8323-9fc26dd5a975

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98b8600 and 7d6b426.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main-estate-audit.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (28)
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: check
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: estate-audit
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
  • GitHub Check: analyze (javascript-typescript, none)
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: GitGuardian Security Checks
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/main-estate-audit.yml (1)

13-13: LGTM!

Also applies to: 16-16, 19-19, 22-22, 25-25, 28-28, 31-31, 34-34, 37-37, 40-40, 43-43, 46-46, 49-49, 52-52, 55-55, 58-58, 61-61, 64-64, 67-67, 70-70, 73-73, 76-76, 79-79, 82-82, 85-85, 88-88, 91-91


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow action references to fixed versions for more consistent and predictable automated checks.
    • No changes to the workflow’s gates, order, or job structure.

Walkthrough

The estate audit workflow now uses immutable commit SHAs for actions/checkout and all 26 CI/CD gates. Gate names, ordering, and job structure remain unchanged.

Changes

Workflow action pinning

Layer / File(s) Summary
Pin workflow actions
.github/workflows/main-estate-audit.yml
actions/checkout now uses commit 11d5960a326750d5838078e36cf38b85af677262. All 26 hyperpolymath/cicd-suite/actions/* gates now use commit 180b419825d238f8b606584c970a81dfa7cb6f81.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: pinning third-party CI actions to full commit SHAs.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changes. It explains the Actions policy requirement, SHA pinning, preserved version references, and the explicit Rust toolchain configuration.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit reads each line,
The patch grows clear beneath the moon,
Small changes hop in place,
Tests guard the garden path,
Reviews bloom before the dawn.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit c710150 into main Sep 20, 2026
28 of 34 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/sha-pin-actions branch September 20, 2026 00:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant