Repository navigation
fix(ci): pin standards reusables to default-branch HEAD - #56
Conversation
This repo's standards reusable pins are re-pointed at the standards default-branch HEAD, resolved live at sweep time. The prior refs are recorded in the verification line below. Three kinds of drift are repaired together and the body does not claim which one this repo had: an UNREACHABLE sha kills the run at workflow STARTUP, so GitHub reports no check at all rather than a failing one and the gate disappears instead of going red; a FLOATING ref (@main) is unpinned supply chain; a merely STALE but reachable sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it. files=5 pins=5 perms=0 permlines=0 from=5b1d00229e5e8c0c0fbfedc7e80f37ea50f49236,81dbf2dd854b1444fd6236fa2352474383b2c2b9,c65436ee3351cd6b0fa14b142938b195efc77586 target=8f2ee508 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (18)
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Update reusable workflow pins .github/workflows/*.yml |
The governance, Hypatia scan, mirror, Scorecards, and secret-scanner workflows now reference updated pinned commits. |
Priority: ⬇️ Low
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 74879
This updates five shared GitHub Actions workflow pins to an immutable current revision while retaining existing workflow configuration. No concrete merge-blocking risk remains.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The description explains the purpose, affected pins, rationale, risks, and verification details. However, it does not use the required template sections and does not complete the RSR Quality Checklist… | Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add the Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections. Mark each applicable checklist item and state the test or verification commands and results. |
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly states that the pull request pins the CI standards reusable workflows to the default-branch HEAD. It matches the main change. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description explains the purpose, affected pins, rationale, risks, and verification details. However, it does not use the required template sections and does not complete the RSR Quality Checklist or provide a clear Testing section.
- Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
A rabbit checks each workflow pin
Five small hashes now settle in
Governance hops in line
Scanners follow the sign
Safe paths start where updates begin
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
|
✅ Coding Agent task started: View task and status The task will inspect the CI failures, validate its fix, and open a stacked fix pull request automatically.
|



Re-points this repo's
hyperpolymath/standardsreusable-workflow pins at the standards default-branch HEAD,8f2ee50841e216cd8c192eeb68953118190f105c.Why this is not a routine version bump.
uses: org/repo/.github/workflows/x.yml@<ref>is resolved at workflow startup, so a bad ref is not a failing job — it is no job at all. This campaign repairs three kinds of drift and does not assume which one this repo had:gh pr checkssimply lists fewer rows. A repo in this state looks greener than one with working gates;@mainruns, but unpinned — the supply-chain property the estate pins for is absent;The refs this repo was actually pinned to, before this PR:
5b1d00229e5e8c0c0fbfedc7e80f37ea50f49236 81dbf2dd854b1444fd6236fa2352474383b2c2b9 c65436ee3351cd6b0fa14b142938b195efc77586.Expect this PR to surface failures that main does not show. Those failures are revealed, not introduced — they are the gates resuming work after being silently absent. The honest comparison is the set of check names emitted here versus on
main, not pass/fail counts. On the canary (hyperpolymath/empty-linter#79) the governance suite was absent on main and emitted 25 checks once repaired.The target is default-branch HEAD resolved at sweep time, never a sha copied from a plan: a reachable but non-HEAD sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it.
Engine:
.git-private-farm/scripts/smtp-notify-sweep.sh --campaign campaigns/pin-repair.sh. Verification for this repo:files=5 pins=5 perms=0 permlines=0 from=5b1d00229e5e8c0c0fbfedc7e80f37ea50f49236,81dbf2dd854b1444fd6236fa2352474383b2c2b9,c65436ee3351cd6b0fa14b142938b195efc77586 target=8f2ee508 sig=G 74879ad canon=a7325fbdc356 base=main🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB