Skip to content

ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #79

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is <caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context is hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis (docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be named hypatia. This wrapper named it scan, and so published scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is --fix output from scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh in hyperpolymath/standards (the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.

…tia`

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job
display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is
`hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named
`hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published
`scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any
requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that
publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte
unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep —
hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: ead90d0f-3e60-4e66-b85c-957f09199eb6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ed618d and 509d6ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (24)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml (1)

19-19: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the internal name of the automated scanning job. No user-facing behaviour has changed.

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow changes its internal job identifier from scan to hypatia. No other workflow behaviour changes.

Changes

Hypatia workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename the workflow job identifier
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml
The job key changes from scan to hypatia.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the CI change: standardising the Hypatia wrapper caller ID to the canonical hypatia value. It matches the job identifier rename.
Description check ✅ Passed The description accurately explains the job identifier rename, the resulting check context, the unchanged workflow content, and the ruleset validation. It is directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checks the workflow name
The scan hops on, unchanged in aim
Hypatia marks the job
No steps shift or logs fog
The pipeline runs the same

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 5240889 into main Sep 20, 2026
25 of 27 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/hypatia-caller-id branch September 20, 2026 23:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant