fix(docs): repair the contributing guide content defects - #78
Conversation
Mechanical repairs to the guide, each anchored on a known-broken form: - unescaped \# -> # No prose is rewritten; only the broken forms are corrected.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (24)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe contribution guide now renders ChangesDocumentation formatting
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Change: Other 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. A rabbit spots the channel sign Comment |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
1 participant
Mechanical repairs to
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md, each anchored on a specific known-broken form:Why these: they are the classes reviewers keep flagging on this file — template tokens left unsubstituted, commands collapsed onto one line by the AsciiDoc→Markdown conversion so copying them passes extra arguments,
\#escapes where#was meant, an invalid():commit header, and a four-space indent that made headings render as code.No prose is rewritten; only the broken forms are corrected. If a pattern is not present the file is untouched.