fix(ci): pin standards reusables to default-branch HEAD - #76
Conversation
This repo's standards reusable pins are re-pointed at the standards default-branch HEAD, resolved live at sweep time. The prior refs are recorded in the verification line below. Three kinds of drift are repaired together and the body does not claim which one this repo had: an UNREACHABLE sha kills the run at workflow STARTUP, so GitHub reports no check at all rather than a failing one and the gate disappears instead of going red; a FLOATING ref (@main) is unpinned supply chain; a merely STALE but reachable sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it. files=3 pins=3 perms=0 permlines=0 from=84355587cb2a1f86e6882de83514a32db2646e7a,main target=8f2ee508 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (17)
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Pin workflow references .github/workflows/governance.yml, .github/workflows/scorecard.yml, .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml |
The governance, Scorecards, and Secret Scanner jobs now use the shared workflow commit SHA instead of mutable or older references. |
Priority: ⬇️ Low
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to e928b
Governance, Scorecards, and Secret Scanner now use a fixed shared workflow revision, improving reproducibility without an identified current merge risk.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The description explains the purpose, affected references, risks, and verification results. However, it omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections fr… | Update the description to use the repository template. Add the required headings, list the three workflow changes, complete the RSR Quality Checklist, and document testing or state why testing is not applicable. Include screenshots or termi… |
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly summarises the main change: pinning standards reusable workflows to the default-branch HEAD commit. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description explains the purpose, affected references, risks, and verification results. However, it omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections from the repository template.
Resolution
Update the description to use the repository template. Add the required headings, list the three workflow changes, complete the RSR Quality Checklist, and document testing or state why testing is not applicable. Include screenshots or terminal output if applicable.
- Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
A rabbit checks each workflow line
Fixed commits now hold the sign
Governance hops in steady light
Scorecards rest on pins so tight
Secret scans run neat and bright
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
🔍 Hypatia Security ScanFindings: 91 issues detected
View findings[
{
"reason": "Action softprops/action-gh-release@v3.0.3 needs attention",
"type": "unpinned_action",
"file": "release.yml",
"action": "pin_sha",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in boj-build.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "boj-build.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in codeql.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "codeql.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dependabot-automerge.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dependabot-automerge.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "Issue in dogfood-gate.yml",
"type": "missing_timeout_minutes",
"file": "dogfood-gate.yml",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "workflow_audit",
"severity": "medium"
}
]Powered by Hypatia Neurosymbolic CI/CD Intelligence |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
The task could not be completed. Open the task for details or retry. |
|
✅ Coding Agent task started: View task and status The task will inspect the CI failures, validate its fix, and open a stacked fix pull request automatically.
⏭️ 4 check(s) skipped — already failing on `main` (not caused by this PR)
|
1 participant
Re-points this repo's
hyperpolymath/standardsreusable-workflow pins at the standards default-branch HEAD,8f2ee50841e216cd8c192eeb68953118190f105c.Why this is not a routine version bump.
uses: org/repo/.github/workflows/x.yml@<ref>is resolved at workflow startup, so a bad ref is not a failing job — it is no job at all. This campaign repairs three kinds of drift and does not assume which one this repo had:gh pr checkssimply lists fewer rows. A repo in this state looks greener than one with working gates;@mainruns, but unpinned — the supply-chain property the estate pins for is absent;The refs this repo was actually pinned to, before this PR:
84355587cb2a1f86e6882de83514a32db2646e7a main.Expect this PR to surface failures that main does not show. Those failures are revealed, not introduced — they are the gates resuming work after being silently absent. The honest comparison is the set of check names emitted here versus on
main, not pass/fail counts. On the canary (hyperpolymath/empty-linter#79) the governance suite was absent on main and emitted 25 checks once repaired.The target is default-branch HEAD resolved at sweep time, never a sha copied from a plan: a reachable but non-HEAD sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it.
Engine:
.git-private-farm/scripts/smtp-notify-sweep.sh --campaign campaigns/pin-repair.sh. Verification for this repo:files=3 pins=3 perms=0 permlines=0 from=84355587cb2a1f86e6882de83514a32db2646e7a,main target=8f2ee508 sig=G e928b07 canon=a7325fbdc356 base=main🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB