Skip to content

ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #108

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is <caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context is hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis (docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be named hypatia. This wrapper named it scan, and so published scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is --fix output from scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh in hyperpolymath/standards (the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.

…tia`

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job
display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is
`hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named
`hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published
`scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any
requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that
publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte
unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep —
hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: d06e48ec-a4a9-4cad-900d-93d40ec8cd4f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36badd3 and 40bbfa6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (32)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: openssf-compliance
  • GitHub Check: check
  • GitHub Check: panic-attack assail
  • GitHub Check: Patch Bridge CVE triage
  • GitHub Check: check
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: estate-rules
  • GitHub Check: Hypatia neurosymbolic scan
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Validate DEED manifests
  • GitHub Check: Validate eclexiaiser manifest
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: Runtime Policy
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
⚠️ CI failures not shown inline (2)

GitHub Actions: Workflow Security Linter / 0_lint-workflows.txt: ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical `hypa…

Conclusion: failure

View job details

##[group]Run echo "=== Checking SPDX License Headers ==="
 �[36;1mecho "=== Checking SPDX License Headers ==="�[0m
 �[36;1mfailed=0�[0m
 �[36;1mfor file in .github/workflows/*.yml .github/workflows/*.yaml; do�[0m
 �[36;1m  [ -f "$file" ] || continue�[0m
 �[36;1m  if ! head -1 "$file" | grep -q "^# SPDX-License-Identifier:"; then�[0m
 �[36;1m    echo "ERROR: $file missing SPDX header"�[0m
 �[36;1m    failed=1�[0m
 �[36;1m  fi�[0m
 �[36;1mdone�[0m
 �[36;1mif [ $failed -eq 1 ]; then�[0m
 �[36;1m  echo "Add '# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0' as first line"�[0m
 �[36;1m  exit 1�[0m
 �[36;1mfi�[0m
 �[36;1mecho "All workflows have SPDX headers"�[0m
 shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
 ##[endgroup]
 === Checking SPDX License Headers ===
 ERROR: .github/workflows/boj-build.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/codeql.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/dependabot-automerge.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/dogfood-gate.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/e2e.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/estate-rules.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/governance.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/guix-nix-policy.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/instant-sync.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/label-triage.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/labels.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/mirror.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/openssf-compliance.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/pages.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/push-email-notify.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/quality.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/release.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/rhodibot.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/runtime-policy.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/scorec...

GitHub Actions: Workflow Security Linter / lint-workflows: ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical `hypa…

Conclusion: failure

View job details

##[group]Run echo "=== Checking SPDX License Headers ==="
 �[36;1mecho "=== Checking SPDX License Headers ==="�[0m
 �[36;1mfailed=0�[0m
 �[36;1mfor file in .github/workflows/*.yml .github/workflows/*.yaml; do�[0m
 �[36;1m  [ -f "$file" ] || continue�[0m
 �[36;1m  if ! head -1 "$file" | grep -q "^# SPDX-License-Identifier:"; then�[0m
 �[36;1m    echo "ERROR: $file missing SPDX header"�[0m
 �[36;1m    failed=1�[0m
 �[36;1m  fi�[0m
 �[36;1mdone�[0m
 �[36;1mif [ $failed -eq 1 ]; then�[0m
 �[36;1m  echo "Add '# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0' as first line"�[0m
 �[36;1m  exit 1�[0m
 �[36;1mfi�[0m
 �[36;1mecho "All workflows have SPDX headers"�[0m
 shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0}
 ##[endgroup]
 === Checking SPDX License Headers ===
 ERROR: .github/workflows/boj-build.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/codeql.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/dependabot-automerge.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/dogfood-gate.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/e2e.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/estate-rules.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/governance.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/guix-nix-policy.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/instant-sync.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/label-triage.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/labels.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/mirror.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/openssf-compliance.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/pages.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/push-email-notify.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/quality.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/release.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/rhodibot.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/runtime-policy.yml missing SPDX header
 ERROR: .github/workflows/scorec...
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Workflow Security Linter / 0_lint-workflows.txt
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

[error] 1-1: SPDX license header is missing. Add '# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0' as the first line.

🪛 GitHub Actions: Workflow Security Linter / lint-workflows
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

[error] 1-1: SPDX license header check failed. Add '# SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0' as the first line.


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Renamed the Hypatia Security Scan workflow job for clearer identification.

Walkthrough

The Hypatia Security Scan workflow job identifier changes from scan to hypatia. The reusable workflow reference and other job configuration remain unchanged.

Changes

Hypatia workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename the workflow job
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml
The job identifier changes from scan to hypatia. Other job configuration remains unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 40bbf

The workflow now publishes the intended Hypatia check context, with no active branch-protection mismatch identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description clearly explains the rename, its purpose, its limited scope, and the branch-ruleset audit. However, it does not use the required template sections and does not record the RSR checklist… Add the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections. Mark each applicable checklist item and state how the workflow change was validated. State that screenshots or terminal output are not applicable, …
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the CI change and the standardisation of the Hypatia caller job ID to hypatia.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description clearly explains the rename, its purpose, its limited scope, and the branch-ruleset audit. However, it does not use the required template sections and does not record the RSR checklist, testing details, or screenshot applicability.

Resolution

Add the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections. Mark each applicable checklist item and state how the workflow change was validated. State that screenshots or terminal output are not applicable, if appropriate.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checks the workflow line
The job now bears a clearer sign
Hypatia hops into place
The scan keeps its familiar pace
No other settings change today

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 7ab98a8 into main Sep 20, 2026
33 of 37 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/hypatia-caller-id branch September 20, 2026 23:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant