Skip to content

ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #144

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is <caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context is hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis (docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be named hypatia. This wrapper named it scan, and so published scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is --fix output from scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh in hyperpolymath/standards (the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.

…tia`

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job
display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is
`hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named
`hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published
`scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any
requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that
publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte
unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep —
hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 8d6788b4-94a8-4f52-8dba-32ccf9871e27

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d19cab0 and 3ba715d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (27)
  • GitHub Check: rust-ci / Detect Cargo.toml
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix primary / Nix fallback policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: lint-workflows
  • GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
  • GitHub Check: PR (address)
  • GitHub Check: Validate A2ML manifests
  • GitHub Check: Validate eclexiaiser manifest
  • GitHub Check: Groove manifest check
  • GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts
  • GitHub Check: Dependency Review
  • GitHub Check: Rust Security Audit
  • GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
  • GitHub Check: Structural E2E (no-build)
  • GitHub Check: Build Check
  • GitHub Check: Build + E2E (Rust + OCaml)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml (1)

18-18: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the name of the security scanning workflow job.

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions job identifier in the Hypatia scan workflow changed from scan to hypatia. The reusable workflow commit remains unchanged.

Changes

Hypatia workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename the workflow job
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml
The job identifier changed from scan to hypatia. The workflow continues to use the pinned Hypatia scan workflow.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the rename of the Hypatia wrapper caller job to the canonical hypatia identifier.
Description check ✅ Passed The description directly explains the job rename, the published check context, and the unchanged workflow content.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit checks the workflow lane
The job name hops from scan to hypatia
The pinned path stays the same
One small change keeps the run clear
Ears up for the next green check

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 4950236 into main Sep 20, 2026
27 of 30 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/hypatia-caller-id branch September 20, 2026 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant