chore(CI): Add ruff workflow - #25
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow to run Ruff linting and formatting checks on pull requests targeting the main branch. The workflow will help maintain code quality by automatically checking Python code style and formatting.
- Adds automated Ruff linting and formatting checks
- Configures the workflow to run on multiple Python versions (3.10-3.14)
- Includes security hardening for the GitHub Actions runner
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: Bobo Bäck Engström <bobo@id8-engineering.io>
Dexter9532
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #20 which was merged but it had 5 commits with identical titles. I cleaned this up, but we need to merge this again.