Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
seems fine. I'm a little worried we don't actually get a notification about the failures... aside from debugging. We also have an MM error handler right? Maybe we could use that? In the hub I think we tap into that to log Honeybadgers |
Contributor
Author
|
Yeah, that's a good point. We should figure out how we can bubble up exceptions without entirely killing the producer |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just FYI, the reason I don't republish the failed message is because it's really hard to know which failed. The way rabbitmq/bunny indicate which message failed is by a message index, which increments from the beginning of your connection every time you publish a message.
We'd have to keep track of the messages indexes for any given loop and what indexes they are, so if a failure happened we would find the right message.
I opted instead to just republish the entire batch of messages for three reasons: