Added a Request Body textarea along with a corresponding Content-Type… #8
Conversation
… definition. Code taken directly from the following fork: https://github.com/taggiasco/resttesttest Patches in that fork included many other changes, so can't provide a direct link.
|
This pull request also helps with Issue #7 |
|
Hi, |
|
@taggiasco Ah, an excellent point, thank you. My attempts to keep the pull request as simple/small as possible missed that fact, and my tests all used headers+body and not parameters. I'll update the pull request at some point. |
request body is sent, the parameters are also included. Still seems to cause issues when using GET + Body, will look into if that should be allowed and/or handle the error more gracefully.
|
@taggiasco @jeroenooms Okay, this merge request seems fine now. I don't fully understand this topic yet as I'm still learning the ins and outs of REST APIs (and HTTP requests in general). |
|
Is there any plan to finally merge this and add this functionality? |
|
@bracco23 This project is no longer active (no commits in 2+ years) so I doubt it. |
|
You know you can easily deploy your own version right? It's just static html. You can upload it to anywhere you want and it'll work :) |
|
@jeroen True, although it's easier to click a button (download) than worry about applying patches :) But I suspect you'll not merge this PR as to keep https://resttesttest.com/ as is, right? Understandable, of course. |
…on, response code and result in new tab links
Added presets + more
5 participants
Added a Request Body textarea along with a corresponding Content-Type definition.
Code taken directly from the following fork:
https://github.com/taggiasco/resttesttest
Patches in that fork included many other changes, so can't provide a direct link.