Conversation
8 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Pilot the reusable Luna OSS Readiness action in a second, independently structured repository rather than validating it only inside
luna-swarm.Change
b9e5dfc3a77dd0a3492879627ed8feda0ad8514c;fail-under: 0during the diagnostic pilot so non-critical maturity gaps are reported without blocking unrelated work.Observed result
The real Actions run completed successfully. BADNOTE scored 33/100: README, MIT license, and CI were detected, while contributor guidance, security policy, governance, community templates, automated tests, and release notes remain genuine maintenance gaps.
Issue #4 now tracks those findings with explicit acceptance criteria.
Boundaries
The audit script does not call an LLM, upload source code, or make network requests. This pilot is in another repository owned by the same maintainer, so it demonstrates cross-repository operation but is not claimed as independent external adoption.
Review decision
Merge only if retaining the diagnostic workflow and its public maintenance backlog is useful for BADNOTE. The initial threshold should remain non-blocking until issue #4 is addressed.