feat(utils): inline utils instead of reexporting @dfinity/utils#866
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
size-limit report 📦
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I want dev to not know about
@dfinity/utilsas they do not know about@dfinity/zod-schemas.If I just reexport I get quite a drawback in terms of bundle size, for example the core worker double (tested in #865).
Therefore, I'll remove the re-export and cherry pick / duplicate few utils. The additional weight is around 5kb which I guess is acceptable to improve the story and also actually reduce the size of most libs because of tree shaking I guess as seen in #865 which is actually great.