Agent: task-20260424-102830-review-follow-up-pr-347-high-risk

[kai-linux]

Closes #348

Automated changes for issue #348.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests cover orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py but bin/run_library_scout.sh (high-risk) is entirely unaddressed and no review findings are documented.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: Four flagged items (bin/run_library_scout.sh high, orchestrator/paths.py high, orchestrator/queue.py high, example.config.yaml medium) required verification. Diff addresses only two (paths.py, queue.py); bin/run_library_scout.sh and example.config.yaml are untouched.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — Diff adds tests for paths.py (load_config skips env-requirements for unenabled tools) and queue.py (curated-tools section rendered/omitted correctly). bin/run_library_scout.sh is flagged high-risk but has zero coverage — no test, no inline review note, no shell-level assertion.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — Diff is purely additive test code. No issues are fixed, and no review findings — positive or negative — are documented anywhere in the shown diff. A clean review should at minimum assert 'no issues found' in the PR description or a comment; neither is visible here.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

The diff adds tests that partially verify orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py behaviour, but the highest-risk flagged file bin/run_library_scout.sh receives no coverage or documentation, and no explicit record of issues found/fixed is present.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: Three of the four explicitly flagged files (bin/run_library_scout.sh, example.config.yaml, and — indirectly — orchestrator/paths.py via a single edge-case test) are either unaddressed or only lightly touched. For a review follow-up covering 16 files / 1266 lines, the diff of ~150 lines in two test files does not constitute sufficient verification of all high-risk surfaces.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — Tests cover load_config (paths.py) and write_prompt curated-tools logic (queue.py), but bin/run_library_scout.sh — flagged high-risk as a shell entry-point — has zero test coverage or manual verification in the diff. example.config.yaml (medium) is also untouched.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff contains only new tests; there is no commit note, inline comment, or doc entry recording what was reviewed, what was found acceptable, or what was fixed in the shell script or config file.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests are added for orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py, but the high-risk shell entry-point bin/run_library_scout.sh and the medium-risk example.config.yaml are entirely unaddressed in the diff.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: Four distinct flagged artifacts (bin/run_library_scout.sh, example.config.yaml, orchestrator/paths.py, orchestrator/queue.py) were identified; the diff touches only the test files for the latter two, leaving two flagged files completely unexamined.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — bin/run_library_scout.sh (flagged high risk) has zero tests or review notes in the diff. orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py each receive targeted tests, so those two files are partially verified, but the criterion requires all flagged high-risk files to be covered.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff is pure test additions with no comments, docs, or fix commits indicating whether issues were found in the reviewed files. Pass/fail of the new tests is not visible from the diff alone.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests added for orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py, but bin/run_library_scout.sh (high-risk) and example.config.yaml are entirely unaddressed with no verification or documented findings.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: Four files were flagged for review (two high-risk, one medium-risk, one high-risk shell entry-point); the diff touches only two of them via tests, leaving the shell entry-point and config example entirely unreviewed.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py receive new tests covering load_config and curated-tool prompt injection. However, bin/run_library_scout.sh (flagged high-risk) and example.config.yaml (medium-risk) are absent from the diff entirely — no tests, no review notes, no sign of inspection.
• fail Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff contains only new passing tests. There is no documented findings summary, no fix commits referencing discovered bugs, and no notes explaining why bin/run_library_scout.sh and example.config.yaml were cleared or deferred.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests added for two of four flagged files, but bin/run_library_scout.sh (high-risk) is entirely unaddressed and no review findings are documented.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: Diff covers 2 of 4 flagged files via test additions; the highest-risk flagged artifact (bin/run_library_scout.sh, a shell entry-point) is entirely absent.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py are covered by new tests; bin/run_library_scout.sh (flagged high-risk) has zero coverage; example.config.yaml (flagged medium-risk) is also absent from the diff.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — Diff adds tests only; no review findings, no bug fixes, and no explicit written confirmation that checked files are correct are visible in the diff.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests added for queue.py and paths.py, but the high-risk shell entry-point bin/run_library_scout.sh and example.config.yaml have no review evidence in the diff, and no issues are documented.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: The diff touches only 2 test files (~150 lines) against 4 flagged files; the two most opaque high-risk artifacts (shell entry-point, example config) are entirely absent.

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — New tests cover orchestrator/queue.py (curated-tools prompt injection) and orchestrator/paths.py (unenabled-tool env requirement), but bin/run_library_scout.sh (flagged high-risk) and example.config.yaml (flagged medium-risk) have no corresponding tests, review comments, or correctness evidence anywhere in the diff.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff is purely additive tests; no issues are called out, fixed, or noted — it is unclear whether the review concluded no issues existed or the findings were simply not recorded.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

Tests cover orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py but the high-risk shell entry-point bin/run_library_scout.sh and medium-risk example.config.yaml are completely unaddressed.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: The issue flagged 4 files across 3 high/2 medium risk signals. The diff touches only 2 test files covering 2 of those 4 flagged files; bin/run_library_scout.sh and example.config.yaml receive no attention.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — bin/run_library_scout.sh (risky_path:high) has no corresponding test or manual verification note in the diff. orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py gain new tests, but one of three high-risk files is entirely skipped.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff only adds tests; there is no documentation of what the review found (clean bill of health, issues fixed, or known gaps) for any of the flagged files.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Auto-merge blocked: work verifier

The diff adds tests only for paths.py and queue.py but leaves two flagged high-risk files (bin/run_library_scout.sh, example.config.yaml) entirely unverified, and provides no documentation or fixes for any issues found during review.

Findings

• scope_mismatch: 4 files were flagged for review (2 high-risk, 2 medium-risk); only 2 of the 4 received new tests. The shell script bin/run_library_scout.sh, the highest-risk single file in the review signals, has no coverage at all.
• missing_tests: Independent judge flagged missing tests for the claimed issue resolution

Acceptance Criteria Review

• fail High-risk file changes are verified correct — Tests cover orchestrator/paths.py and orchestrator/queue.py, but bin/run_library_scout.sh (flagged high-risk: shell entry-point) and example.config.yaml (flagged medium-risk) have zero corresponding test coverage or manual verification evidence in the diff.
• uncertain Any issues found are fixed or documented — The diff is purely additive test code; no fixes are present and no documentation of review findings (e.g. comments, issue comments, or a findings note) appears in the diff. It is impossible to determine from the diff alone whether the review concluded 'no issues found' or simply omitted fixes.

Use /verify-override <repo> <pr_number> [reason] to unblock with an audited operator override.

[kai-linux]

Closing — the agent's deliverable (tests for unrelated files) didn't match the review-doc nature of issue #348. Review has been completed manually and documented in #348.