fix(actions): report resumable results consistently

[lastobelus]

Outcome

Makes every repository-owned resumable Project Action speak the shipped LastCode Action protocol through one small Markover-side reporter. Direct terminal runs keep their readable legacy summaries, while resumable runs emit coarse progress and one concise terminal report without turning crashes, nonzero exits, timeouts, or cancellation into authored success.

Linked work

Direct maintainer request; no tracking issue.

Scope

• Included: Wait for PR, Run Local CI, Start Dev Build, Run Intel Validation, stable t3.json IDs, focused reporter/action tests, and agent workflow guidance.
• Deliberately excluded: LastCode runtime changes, saved-Action database mutation, graphical setup, and UI behavior.

Validation

• npm run check
• npm test
• Focused automated tests for changed behavior
• Relevant manual macOS validation, when applicable
• Before-and-after screenshots for meaningful visual changes, when applicable
• Documentation updated, when applicable
• Third-party notices regenerated for production dependency changes, when applicable

Validation details

• npm run ci:local: 988 tests passed; smoke passed 13 checks.
• Focused build and 51 Action/workflow tests passed.
• Focused ESLint and repository typecheck passed.
• No graphical or visual behavior changed; manual UI validation and screenshots are not applicable.
• No dependency change; third-party notices check passed unchanged.
• Markover Run Local CI was not saved for this LastCode thread, so the documented direct fallback ran instead.

Not performed

• A live resumable launch from a Markover-owned LastCode thread was unavailable; framing compatibility, direct output, single-result enforcement, and host-failure behavior are covered by focused automated tests.

Implemented by OpenAI Codex (GPT-5).

[lastobelus]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-08-31T23:23:13.784890Z	22cb264	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5859ff9415

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[lastobelus]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: af9ed802ae

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[lastobelus]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 22cb26413d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".