Skip to content

docs: add ltdetrv2 m/l COCO benchmarks and checkpoints#900

Open
gabrielfruet wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
gabriel-trn-2324-update-docs-for-ltdetrv2-object-detection
Open

docs: add ltdetrv2 m/l COCO benchmarks and checkpoints#900
gabrielfruet wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
gabriel-trn-2324-update-docs-for-ltdetrv2-object-detection

Conversation

@gabrielfruet

@gabrielfruet gabrielfruet commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Depends on: #887 (must merge first or together — the m/l -coco aliases don't exist until then)

What has changed and why?

Docs previously only covered ltdetrv2-s. This adds the new ltdetrv2-m/l
COCO benchmark results and checkpoint aliases to object_detection.md, matching
the numbers already landing in the README (#894) and the checkpoint wiring in
#887.

How has it been tested?

Docs-only change; visually checked the rendered markdown table for alignment.

Did you update CHANGELOG.md?

  • Yes
  • Not needed (internal change)

Did you update the documentation?

  • Yes
  • Not needed (internal change without effects for user)

@gabrielfruet gabrielfruet changed the title docs: add ltdetrv2 m/l/x COCO benchmarks and checkpoints docs: add ltdetrv2 m/l COCO benchmarks and checkpoints Jul 24, 2026
@gabrielfruet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/codex review

@gabrielfruet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/review

@gabrielfruet
gabrielfruet marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2026 14:41

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ee4cf61790

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/source/object_detection.md
| picodet-s-coco | 26.7\* | 2.2\* | 1.17 | 416×416 |
| picodet-l-coco | 32.0\* | 2.4\* | 3.75 | 416×416 |
| **ltdetrv2-s-coco** | **50.7** | **5.4** | **9.9** | **640×640** |
| **ltdetrv2-m-coco** | **53.1** | **7.95** | **21.1** | **640×640** |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comments for README. I would add the plot here with some comparision and also move picodet to the very end.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or alternatively, group the results with model backbones. I think up to this point the table is a bit too long to read.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then I'll wait for the plot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants