Skip to content

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

 
 

Latest commit

 

History

30 Commits

Folders and files

Repository files navigation

Tapway Superpowers

MIT License

A Claude Code plugin with 17 AI skills, 5 guardrail hooks, and specialized subagents for full-stack development (Next.js 14 + Python FastAPI). The plugin enforces best practices structurally — TDD via agent boundaries, mandatory PR gates, docs on every push — so good habits happen automatically.

Quick Install

# 1. Register this repo as a marketplace
claude plugin marketplace add https://github.com/tapway/tapway-superpowers

# 2. Install the plugin
claude plugin install tapway-superpowers@tapway-superpowers

Skills and hooks activate immediately. No restart, no config files.

Recommended companion plugins:

claude plugin install andrej-karpathy-skills@karpathy-skills
claude plugin install claude-code-setup@claude-plugins-official

Table of Contents


Modes

Not sure which mode applies? Use this table:

Situation Mode
Solo developer, building a new feature or fixing a bug Individual
Team of 2+ people working on the same repo in parallel Team Collaboration
Taking over or improving an existing codebase without tests Legacy Refactor

Individual — solo feature or bug fix

Full guide: this section covers it. No separate document needed.

Workflow

/interview → /brainstorming → /plan → [implement] → /simplify → /review → /pr

/interview is optional but recommended any time the request is underspecified. /observe runs before /pr on any new endpoint. /doubt is called on demand for high-stakes decisions.

Step 0 — Clarify (when the request is fuzzy)

/interview

One question at a time. Stops when it can predict your next three questions. Outputs a Confirmed Intent statement (outcome / user / why now / success / constraints / out of scope) that feeds into /brainstorming or /plan. Never start planning until intent is confirmed.

Step 1 — Brainstorm (optional, but recommended for anything non-trivial)

/brainstorming

Explore approaches, surface trade-offs, name confusion before writing code. Output is committed to docs/brainstorming/. Run /deep-research first if the domain is unfamiliar.

Step 2 — Plan

/plan

Generates docs/plans/[feature].md with file map, task breakdown, and success criteria. For multi-task features, also generates a work package checklist at docs/checklists/[feature]-checklist.md.

Step 3 — Implement

Fast path — fully automated:

"implement it with autopilot"   →   /autoship

Reads the plan, validates it, runs TDD subagents per task, then simplify → review → PR. You only intervene if a task blocks twice.

Deploy mode — on a staging server:

"implement and deploy"   →   /autoship (deploy mode)

Same as above, but adds a deployment phase before opening the PR: detects the deploy method (docker compose / make / npm), deploys, waits for a health check, runs integration and E2E tests, then includes the deployment evidence in the PR body. Never opens a PR with a broken deployment.

Manual path — step by step:

/tdd

Test Writer agent (RED) → coordinator gate → Implementer agent (GREEN + REFACTOR) per task. Structurally impossible to skip the failing test.

Between steps — on demand

/doubt

Use this any time you're about to commit to an irreversible decision: service boundary, schema migration, auth flow, security assumption. Spawns a fresh-context adversarial reviewer that sees only the artifact + contract — never your reasoning. Max 3 cycles.

/observe

Run this before /pr on any new endpoint, background task, or external integration. Defines on-call questions first, then adds structured logging (with correlation IDs), RED metrics (bounded labels), OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation, and symptom-based alerts. Includes staging verification: induce failures, confirm telemetry catches them.

Step 4 — Pre-PR sequence (always, in this order)

/simplify       ← reduce complexity and duplication
/review         ← three-tier self-review (Critical / Warnings / Suggestions)
/pr             ← rebase, test, update docs, push, open PR

/pr is mandatory — it rebases against main, runs the full test suite, updates project docs, and opens a structured PR. Never push manually.


Team Collaboration — parallel work packages

Full guide: docs/team-guide.md — step-by-step walkthrough with Alice, Bob, and Charlie working on JWT auth in parallel, with exact commands and Claude prompts for every step.

Workflow

Tech lead: /brainstorming → /plan → commit docs → assign packages
Each member: worktree → /tdd or /autoship → /pr
After all PRs: merge in dependency order → /release

How It Works

One worktree per person per package. Never two people editing the same branch.

# After self-assigning in docs/checklists/[feature]-checklist.md:
git worktree add -b feat/[feature]-[package] ../[project]-[package] origin/main
cd ../[project]-[package] && claude
# Tell Claude: "I'm picking up the [Backend] work package for [feature]. Let's start implementing."

Docs as the coordination layer. docs/checklists/ is the live status board — who has what, what's in progress, what's merged. No Slack threads needed for "who's doing what".

docs/
  brainstorming/   ← why we chose this approach
  plans/           ← what we're building and how
  checklists/      ← who is doing what, current status

Auto-review on every PR + @claude for fixes. Every PR gets an automatic three-tier code review when opened. After review, anyone can mention @claude in a comment to push fix commits directly to the branch. See GitHub Actions — AI-Powered PR Review for setup instructions and the required ANTHROPIC_API_KEY secret.

Merge order matters. If Package B depends on Package A's schema changes, merge A first and have B rebase:

git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main
# resolve any conflicts, then re-push

Quick Reference

# Self-assign and start
# 1. Edit docs/checklists/[feature]-checklist.md → set Assignee + 🟡
git add docs/checklists/ && git commit -m "chore: claim [package] for [name]" && git push

# 2. Create worktree
git worktree add -b feat/[feature]-[package] ../[project]-[package] origin/main
cd ../[project]-[package] && claude

# 3. Implement (automated or manual)
# "implement it with autopilot"   OR   /tdd

# 4. Exit via PR (never push manually)
# /simplify → /review → /pr

Legacy Refactor — existing repo without tests

Full guide: docs/legacy-refactor-guide.md — complete workflow for teams taking over an existing codebase.

The Core Problem

You cannot safely refactor code you haven't locked down with tests. On legacy code that means writing characterization tests — tests that capture current behavior before you change anything — before the first line of refactored code is written.

Workflow

Install superpowers → /repo-docs → /code-review + /security-audit
  → /brainstorming (refactor goals)
  → Characterization tests  ← lock down current behavior FIRST
  → /plan → /tdd → /pr

Key Differences from the Standard Workflow

Step Standard (new feature) Legacy refactor
Tests Written for desired behavior Written for current behavior first
RED phase Fails because feature doesn't exist Fails because code is too coupled to unit-test
GREEN phase Implement the behavior Decouple/extract until test + characterization tests pass
Plan scope New capabilities Specific code smells with measurable before/after

For Bulk Mechanical Changes

For renames, deprecated API replacements, and import path updates across many files — use the optional code-refactor community skill:

claude plugin add code-refactor@andrej-karpathy-skills

Always write characterization tests before running bulk changes on untested code. Bulk renames on untested code cascade silently into broken behavior.

Quick Start

# 1. Generate architecture docs first
/repo-docs

# 2. Run audits (parallel)
/code-review
/security-audit

# 3. Set refactoring goals
/brainstorming
# "Given the audit findings, what does this codebase need to look like in 6 months?"

# 4. Write characterization tests — before any production change
# See docs/legacy-refactor-guide.md for examples

# 5. Plan + execute + PR
/plan → /tdd → /pr

GitHub Actions — AI-Powered PR Review

The plugin ships a GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/claude.yml) that gives every PR an automatic AI code review and lets any team member trigger fix commits by mentioning @claude in a comment.

This must be added to each project repo separately. Run /setup-project in any repo to create and commit the file automatically.

Prerequisites

Add ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to GitHub repo secrets — this is required for any of the below to work.

GitHub repo → Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → New repository secret
  Name:  ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
  Value: your key from https://console.anthropic.com

Without this secret, the workflow will be present but every run will fail with an authentication error.

How It Works — Two Jobs

The workflow contains two separate jobs with different triggers and permissions:

1. auto-review — fires on every PR, no mention needed

Property Value
Trigger PR opened, updated (synchronize), or reopened
Permissions Read-only (contents: read, pull-requests: write)
What it does Posts a three-tier code review as inline PR comments

Claude reads the full diff and posts findings categorised as:

  • Critical — must fix before merge (bugs, security issues, data loss risks, broken contracts)
  • Warning — should fix or justify (missing tests, type gaps, N+1 queries, unhandled errors)
  • Suggestion — optional improvements (simplification, naming, duplication)

If Critical findings exist, Claude requests changes. If only Warnings/Suggestions, it approves with comments. The review summary is prefixed with ## Auto-review so it's clearly labelled as automated.

2. on-mention — fires when @claude is mentioned

Property Value
Trigger @claude in any PR comment, review comment, or review body
Permissions Read-write (contents: write) — can push fix commits
What it does Executes whatever instruction follows @claude

Common uses:

@claude fix the Critical findings from the auto-review
@claude fix the failing test in test_auth_service.py
@claude resolve the merge conflict in this file
@claude explain why this approach was chosen

Setup

Option A — Automated (recommended):

/setup-project

Creates .github/workflows/claude.yml, commits it, and prints the remaining manual steps including the secret reminder.

Option B — Manual:

mkdir -p .github/workflows
# Copy .github/workflows/claude.yml from this repo into your project
git add .github/workflows/claude.yml
git commit -m "chore: add @claude GitHub Actions workflow"
git push

Then add ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to GitHub repo secrets.

Verifying It Works

  1. Open any PR in the repo
  2. Within ~30 seconds, an ## Auto-review comment should appear from the auto-review job
  3. On the same PR, comment @claude explain what this PR does — the on-mention job should reply within ~30 seconds

If either job doesn't fire or errors out, check:

  • ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is set in repo secrets (Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions)
  • Both jobs have id-token: write in their permissions block — the action uses OIDC for authentication and will fail with "Unable to get ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_URL" without it
  • Both jobs have actions/checkout@v4 as the first step — the action runs git fetch internally and will fail with "fatal: not a git repository" if the repo isn't checked out first
  • The workflow file exists at .github/workflows/claude.yml
  • GitHub Actions is enabled for the repo (Settings → Actions → General)

Cost

Each auto-review run costs roughly $0.50–2.00 depending on the size of the diff (input tokens). on-mention runs vary by task. For a small team running 20–30 PRs/month, expect under $30/month total.

To limit auto-review to specific branches (e.g. only PRs targeting main):

on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
    branches: [main]   # add this line

Release Convention — YYYY.WW.XX.YY

Releases are created automatically every time a PR merges to staging or prod, via .github/workflows/release.yml.

Format

YYYY.WW.XX.YY-env
Segment Meaning Example
YYYY Year 2026
WW ISO week number (01–53) 24
XX Major increment within the week 1
YY Minor increment within XX (bugfix / small change) 3
-env Target environment -stg or -prod

Examples

2026.24.1.0-stg   ← first merge of week 24 to staging
2026.24.1.1-stg   ← bugfix on top of 1.0
2026.24.1.2-stg   ← another small change
2026.24.2.0-stg   ← breaking change or major feature (XX increments, YY resets)
2026.24.1.0-prod  ← stg 1.0 promoted to prod

Rules

  • YY increments on every merge by default
  • XX increments (and YY resets to 0) when any commit in the merge contains feat! or BREAKING CHANGE in the message
  • Both counters reset to XX=1 YY=0 at the start of each new week
  • stg and prod maintain independent XX.YY counters

Setup

release.yml is created automatically by /setup-project. It requires only the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN — no extra secrets needed.

Set staging as your repo's default branch (GitHub → Settings → Branches → Default branch) so gh pr create targets it automatically (branch name: staging, tag suffix: -stg).


What You Get

17 Skills

AI behaviors that activate automatically when you use relevant keywords. Also invokable explicitly with /skill-name.

Skill What it does Triggers
brainstorming Explore approaches, surface trade-offs, save decisions to docs/brainstorming/ "Let's think about...", "What are the options..."
writing-plans Implementation plans with file maps, task breakdowns, and work package checklists. Saves to docs/plans/ + docs/checklists/ "Write a plan...", "Break this down..."
autoship Fully automated plan-to-PR: validates plan, runs TDD subagents per task, then simplify → review → docs → PR. Deploy mode (on staging server): also deploys, health-checks, and runs integration/E2E tests before PR "implement it with autopilot", "autoship" / "implement and deploy", "ship and deploy"
tdd Test Writer agent (RED) → coordinator gate → Implementer agent (GREEN + REFACTOR). Structurally enforces TDD. "Start implementing...", "implement", any new feature or bug fix
verification Confirm a task is done — tests, lint, type-checks, spec coverage "Is this done?", "Verify...", "Final check..."
refactor Protocol A (active codebase): surgical incremental refactoring. Protocol B (legacy): characterization-test-first sequence "Refactor...", "Clean up...", "Legacy refactor..."
code-review Three-tier review: Critical, Warnings, Suggestions "Review my changes...", "Check this before I push..."
systematic-debugging Repro → Isolate → Hypothesize → Test → Fix → Post-mortem saved to docs/post-mortems/ "Why is X failing?", "Debug...", "Works locally but not in prod..."
pr Rebase, conflict resolution, test gate, update docs, push, open PR, update checklist "Create a PR...", "I'm done...", "Push and PR..."
git-worktrees Manage parallel git worktrees for concurrent feature work "Worktree...", "Parallel branches..."
repo-docs Generate ARCHITECTURE.md, WORKFLOWS.md, DB_SCHEMA.md, DEPLOYMENT.md "Document this repo...", "Write architecture docs..."
security-audit Full-codebase OWASP Top 10 audit — for pre-launch or major refactors "Security audit...", "Audit the whole codebase..."
pre-review-cleanup Scan for template placeholders, boilerplate, and stale scaffold code "Clean up template files...", "Remove boilerplate..."
setup-project One-time setup: creates .github/workflows/claude.yml and CLAUDE.md, commits, prints checklist for remaining manual steps "set up the @claude workflow", "setup project", "add @claude to this repo"
interview Requirements extraction — one question at a time before planning begins. Stops when it can predict your next 3 questions. Outputs a Confirmed Intent statement. "interview me", "help me figure out requirements", "I'm not sure what I want"
doubt Adversarial in-flight decision review. Fresh-context subagent gets only artifact + contract (never your reasoning). Finds problems, doesn't approve. Max 3 cycles. "second opinion", "double-check this decision", "stress-test this design"
observe Structured observability shipped with the feature: on-call questions first → structured logs + correlation IDs → RED metrics → OTel → symptom-based alerts → staging verification "add observability", "add logging", "add metrics", "add tracing", "instrument this"
deprecate Safe removal of APIs, modules, or features: decision gate → replacement first → advisory/compulsory type → migration guide → Strangler/Adapter/Feature-flag → zero-usage gate → remove "deprecate this", "remove this API", "sunset this feature", "migrate away from X"

All skills apply Andrej Karpathy's coding principles: Think Before Coding, Simplicity First, Surgical Changes, Goal-Driven Execution.


5 Guardrail Hooks

Automatic checks that fire on Claude Code lifecycle events.

Hook Event What it does
pre-bash-safety PreToolUse (Bash) Blocks force-push, hard-reset on main, direct commits to main. Blocks prod commands unless ALLOW_PROD=1 is set.
post-write-lint PostToolUse (Write|Edit) Runs the project linter on changed files
pre-commit-secrets PreToolUse (git commit) Scans staged files for secrets, keys, and credentials before allowing a commit
session-start SessionStart Displays project info, git status, and environment summary when Claude Code opens
post-commit-release-note PostToolUse (git commit) Parses conventional commits and appends formatted entries to CHANGELOG.unreleased.md

4 Specialized Agents

Subagent definitions for use with the TDD and autoship skills:

Agent Purpose
code-reviewer Systematic review with security, performance, and type-safety checks
test-writer Write tests following project conventions (pytest / Jest)
security-auditor OWASP Top 10 audit for auth, payments, and user data paths
devops-sre Docker, CI/CD, and infrastructure configuration review

Slash Commands Reference

Command Mode Purpose
/setup-project All One-time project setup: creates .github/workflows/claude.yml and CLAUDE.md, commits, and prints a manual-steps checklist (GitHub secret). Run this in any new repo adopting the plugin.
/interview All Extract requirements one question at a time before planning. Use when the request is underspecified. Output feeds into /brainstorming or /plan.
/brainstorming All Explore approaches before coding
/plan All Write implementation plan + work package checklist
/autoship Individual / Team Run full plan-to-PR loop automatically. Add "and deploy" to also deploy + run integration tests before PR (staging server only)
/tdd Individual / Team TDD subagents for task-by-task implementation
/refactor Individual / Legacy Incremental (Protocol A) or legacy characterization-test workflow (Protocol B)
/doubt All Adversarial review of any high-stakes decision before it's locked in. Use for irreversible changes, service boundaries, security assumptions.
/observe All Add structured logging, RED metrics, OTel, and alerts to any new endpoint or task. Run before /pr.
/pr All Rebase, test, update docs, push, open PR, update checklist — mandatory exit
/deprecate All Safe removal of any API, module, or feature. Enforces: replacement first, migration guide, zero-usage gate.
/repo-docs Legacy / All Generate architecture, schema, workflow, deployment docs
/cleanup Individual Remove template artifacts (tapway-claude-template users only)
/review All Three-tier self-review before PR
/release <patch|minor|major> All Semver bump, release notes, git tag
/upgrade-skills All Update all plugins to latest

Built-in Claude Code Skills

These ship with Claude Code — no installation needed. Several are wired into the skills above.

Built-in What it does When to use
/deep-research Multi-source web research with fact-checking and citations Before /brainstorming for unfamiliar tech
/bugfix Repro-first: failing test → root cause → minimal fix → regression test Focused code bugs
/investigate Parallel hypothesis agents with adversarial refutation; formal root-cause report Production incidents
/simplify Reviews changed code for reuse, simplification, efficiency; applies fixes Always after /tdd, before /review
/security-review Security review of the current branch diff Before PRs touching auth, payments, user data
/verify Launches the app and observes behavior in a running environment Golden-path confirmation beyond tests

/security-review vs /security-audit: /security-review scans the current diff (fast, pre-PR). /security-audit scans the full codebase (thorough, pre-launch or after major refactors).


Guardrails That Run Silently

These happen automatically — no commands needed:

  • Can't commit to main directly — the hook blocks it and tells you to create a branch
  • Can't run prod commands accidentally — blocked unless ALLOW_PROD=1 is set
  • Secrets caught before commit — staged files scanned for keys and credentials on every git commit
  • Linting after every file edit — runs the project linter automatically
  • Release notes auto-generated — every conventional commit appends to CHANGELOG.unreleased.md
  • Docs updated on every PR — /pr runs /repo-docs or updates affected doc sections before pushing
  • Missing workflow detected on session start — if .github/workflows/claude.yml is absent, the session-start hook warns and tells you to run /setup-project

Upgrading

/upgrade-skills

Or manually:

claude plugin marketplace update
claude plugin update tapway-superpowers@tapway-superpowers

Restart Claude Code after updating to apply changes.


For Template Users

If you cloned the tapway-claude-template, this plugin is already declared in .claude/settings.json and auto-installs on first open. No install commands needed.


Uninstalling

claude plugin uninstall tapway-superpowers@tapway-superpowers

Your code and project docs are unaffected.


License

MIT © Tapway

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages