Performance analysis: unchecked blocks comparison #113
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR addresses issue #10 by conducting a comprehensive performance comparison between the current
SizedAndThreadedAVLBalancedTreeMethodsimplementation usinguncheckedblocks and a version without them.Key Findings
🚀 Removing
uncheckedblocks improves performance by 2-9%Detailed Results
Performance Measurements
Test Methodology
Why This Happens
Modern .NET 8 JIT compiler optimizations work better with bounds checking enabled:
Recommendation
Remove the
uncheckedblocks fromSizedAndThreadedAVLBalancedTreeMethods.csfor:Files Added
PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS.md- Comprehensive analysis and recommendationsexperiments/- Complete benchmark suite with statistical testingTest plan
The benchmark code is fully reproducible and can be run with:
cd experiments dotnet run --project UncheckedPerformanceComparison.csproj --configuration Release🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Resolves #10