Solution: LP-0003 - Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor- #98 - #124
Solution: LP-0003 - Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor- #98#124Timidan wants to merge 18 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Added submitter information to the LP-0003 solution.
✅ Validation passedA reviewer will assess against the prize criteria. Automated check. See solution template and TERMS. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds the LP-0003 solution write-up (“DistributionX”) to the repository’s solutions/ directory, documenting approach, evidence, and checklist alignment for the Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor prize track.
Changes:
- Added
solutions/LP-0003.mdsolution submission with summary, approach, success-criteria checklist, and FURPS self-assessment - Included testnet deployment/evidence links and supporting materials
- Added Terms & Conditions acknowledgement
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
|
Moving this PR to draft as the description says "Test PR" - please open for review once the PR is ready. @Timidan |
|
The current implementation and evidence are available at commit |
|
Hi @Timidan, thanks. I’ve started checking the new evidence, and the main fixes look to be there. Before I finish the review, please update this PR itself. Please update the solution file and description to pin the exact version you want reviewed, including the new video, release files, CI run, program ID, and testnet evidence from your latest comment. Once that is done, I can finish the review against one clear version. |
|
thanks for the review...i have applied the fixes! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @Timidan, I’ve finished checking the updated submission against LP3.
The previous blockers are now fixed. The full standalone test runs in CI with
real proof mode, the Basecamp packages are downloadable and load correctly, the
live testnet state confirms two distributions with 20 accepted claims, and the
new video clearly shows the exact version, proof generation, a successful claim,
and a duplicate claim being rejected.
This now meets the LP3 requirements, so I’m approving it.
There are three small follow-ups that do not need to hold up this PR: clarify the
native claim versus optional settlement wording, state that the release and
current source use two different revisions, and document the Linux/modern Bash
requirement for the helper script. We can track those separately.
cc @hackyguru
|
Thanks a lot @danisharora099 ... i have added these explicit details to the submission file and other related docs |
|
Hi again @danisharora099 is there anything else needed from my side? |
|
Hi @Timidan — nothing more needed from you, thanks for your patience. The review is complete and the submission is approved from the engineering side. We've forwarded the recommendation to the Lambda Prize program team for the final award decision and merge. Once the PR is merged you can open the payment claim as described in the README. I'll update here as soon as it's confirmed. @hackyguru @weboko — LP-0003 recommendation is to award to this submission and merge into |
|
@Timidan thanks for the submission! While it is very strong submission there are minor things to address to comply with submission criteria:
Since I see CI passing during submission and needed information for the solution - I am keeping this submission open. |
|
@weboko i updated the solution doc and reran the CI -- the CI failed because my git ran out of CI minutes quota |
LP-0003 submission snapshot (for review)
I’ve pinned this PR to a single, reviewable revision.
LEZ testnet evidence (current)
4bf08c88a91871ecf69ff08af42591a597c51142cbc1f9c6fbbb7d2e888d9ee3Supporting materials (all pinned to
fb4587767...)All references are now current and no longer point to the old
822c508/RC5 material.