Skip to content

Solution: LP-0003 - Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor- #98 - #124

Open
Timidan wants to merge 18 commits into
logos-co:masterfrom
Timidan:master
Open

Solution: LP-0003 - Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor- #98#124
Timidan wants to merge 18 commits into
logos-co:masterfrom
Timidan:master

Conversation

@Timidan

@Timidan Timidan commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 11, 2026 16:29
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Validation passed

A reviewer will assess against the prize criteria.
ℹ️ Solution submission for LP-0003.
ℹ️ Checking repo: https://github.com/Timidan/dist-x


Automated check. See solution template and TERMS.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds the LP-0003 solution write-up (“DistributionX”) to the repository’s solutions/ directory, documenting approach, evidence, and checklist alignment for the Private Allowlist / Airdrop Distributor prize track.

Changes:

  • Added solutions/LP-0003.md solution submission with summary, approach, success-criteria checklist, and FURPS self-assessment
  • Included testnet deployment/evidence links and supporting materials
  • Added Terms & Conditions acknowledgement

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread solutions/LP-0003.md Outdated
Comment thread solutions/LP-0003.md Outdated
Comment thread solutions/LP-0003.md Outdated
@danisharora099

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Moving this PR to draft as the description says "Test PR" - please open for review once the PR is ready. @Timidan

@Timidan
Timidan marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2026 15:41
@danisharora099

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @Timidan, thanks. I’ve started checking the new evidence, and the main fixes look to be there.

Before I finish the review, please update this PR itself. solutions/LP-0003.md still points to the old 822c508 version, old video, old program ID and testnet run, and it still says the standalone CI test is skipped. The PR description also still says “Test PR”.

Please update the solution file and description to pin the exact version you want reviewed, including the new video, release files, CI run, program ID, and testnet evidence from your latest comment. Once that is done, I can finish the review against one clear version.

@Timidan

Timidan commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@danisharora099

thanks for the review...i have applied the fixes!

@danisharora099 danisharora099 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Timidan, I’ve finished checking the updated submission against LP3.

The previous blockers are now fixed. The full standalone test runs in CI with
real proof mode, the Basecamp packages are downloadable and load correctly, the
live testnet state confirms two distributions with 20 accepted claims, and the
new video clearly shows the exact version, proof generation, a successful claim,
and a duplicate claim being rejected.

This now meets the LP3 requirements, so I’m approving it.

There are three small follow-ups that do not need to hold up this PR: clarify the
native claim versus optional settlement wording, state that the release and
current source use two different revisions, and document the Linux/modern Bash
requirement for the helper script. We can track those separately.

cc @hackyguru

@Timidan

Timidan commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks a lot @danisharora099 ... i have added these explicit details to the submission file and other related docs

@Timidan

Timidan commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi again @danisharora099

is there anything else needed from my side?

@danisharora099

danisharora099 commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @Timidan — nothing more needed from you, thanks for your patience. The review is complete and the submission is approved from the engineering side. We've forwarded the recommendation to the Lambda Prize program team for the final award decision and merge. Once the PR is merged you can open the payment claim as described in the README. I'll update here as soon as it's confirmed.

@hackyguru @weboko — LP-0003 recommendation is to award to this submission and merge into solutions/; could you confirm and merge (or let me know if you'd like me to)?

@weboko

weboko commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Timidan thanks for the submission!

While it is very strong submission there are minor things to address to comply with submission criteria:

  • CI not green at default-branch;
  • solution file is important for the submission and it is missing a lot of information (though I see them in the repo) - the Usability, Reliability, privacy-model and CU rows are absent;

Since I see CI passing during submission and needed information for the solution - I am keeping this submission open.

@Timidan

Timidan commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@weboko i updated the solution doc and reran the CI -- the CI failed because my git ran out of CI minutes quota

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants