feat: research-driven copy + 3-tier pricing (£29/£39/£49) - #3
Conversation
Hero: 'Finish the book you already started' + 'You steer. InkWeave weaves.' New before/after section (fragments -> manuscript) Trust bar: author-owned, never-trained, AI-assisted, KDP-aware Pricing rebuilt: Draft £29, Author £39 (anchor), Publish-Ready £49 Vs-competitors repositioned: between ChatGPT/Sudowrite and Reedsy/Scrivener CTAs: 'Try one chapter free' (concrete risk-reversal per research) Metadata updated for SEO
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1208a55afa
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| cta: "Start free", | ||
| href: "/start", | ||
| name: "Draft", | ||
| price: "£29", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Keep the entry price consistent
Introducing the £29 Draft plan as a full-manuscript option conflicts with the conversion form users reach from this CTA: /start still says “Full book from £39.” Anyone clicking “Start at £29” lands on a page that raises the apparent entry price, which makes the new cheapest paid plan look unavailable or misleading right at checkout intent.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Applied research from docx. Hero copy, before/after, trust signals, repositioned vs ChatGPT-Sudowrite-Reedsy-Scrivener axis, pricing per research recommendation.