[codex] Improve student application reports#2
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 28da0c96d3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| student_summary_rows = build_student_summary( | ||
| records, | ||
| friendly_labels=args.friendly_labels, | ||
| redact=args.redact, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Redact organization summaries when --redact is enabled
The new --redact flow only applies redaction to detail rows and student_summary_rows, but summary_rows are still built from raw records and then written to applications_summary.csv and reused in HTML/PDF summaries, which include latest_subject. In a share workflow, this leaks unredacted subject text even though --redact promises subjects are hidden in shareable outputs, so private mailbox content can still be exposed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
What changed
Validation