Skip to content

docs: cite launcher-standard_praxis.deed, not the deleted a2ml - #75

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/ac1-cite-launcher-standard-praxis-deed
Sep 22, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/ac1-cite-launcher-standard-praxis-deed

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

This repo's launcher descriptor cited launcher-standard.a2ml, which
standards#952 deleted.

The change

Comment lines only:

from to
# Compliant with launcher-standard.a2ml v0.3.0 # Compliant with launcher-standard_praxis.deed v0.4.0
# Per launcher-standard.a2ml [version-output] section # Per launcher-standard_praxis.deed (version-output ...) clause
# Per launcher-standard.a2ml [runtime] section: # Per launcher-standard_praxis.deed (runtime ...) clause:

The old citation was wrong twice over: wrong file, and [section] bracket
notation the DEED grammar does not have. DEED is s-expression based — the real
clause heads are (version-output ...) and (runtime ...), verified in
hyperpolymath/standards launcher/launcher-standard_praxis.deed.

Why v0.4.0 is earned, not asserted

This descriptor does not resolve the standard — (resolution (standard-search ...))
does not apply to it. So naming the current version is a statement of
conformance, not a claim about a resolution path.

Scope

Comment-only. No behaviour change, and independent of the file extension —
migrating .launcher.a2ml → .deed is a separate workstream gated behind
hyperpolymath/launch-scaffolder#40 under the dual-accept rule, and is
deliberately not attempted here.

Verification

git grep -c 'launcher-standard\.a2ml' over this repo returns 0.

Refs: hyperpolymath/standards#960 (AC1), standards#837, owner ruling D73-C.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01WPSJ7fBhVAMcpSffCBWUDo

standards#952 deleted launcher/launcher-standard.a2ml. This descriptor
still named it, and used [section] bracket notation the DEED grammar does
not have. Cites the live launcher-standard_praxis.deed at its current
version and uses DEED clause notation.

v0.4.0 is a statement of conformance, not a resolution path: this
descriptor does not resolve the standard, so it names the current version
rather than a version it loads.

Comment-only; no behaviour change, and independent of the file extension
(the .deed extension migration is gated behind launch-scaffolder#40).

Refs: hyperpolymath/standards#960 (AC1), standards#837, D73-C.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WPSJ7fBhVAMcpSffCBWUDo
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack →

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 58f09b20-7fb2-44f5-bf69-38407e6a8aa4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d96af2 and 60eab77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • enaction-engine.launcher.a2ml
 __________________________________________________________
< If your code was a carrot, I'd bury it and forget where. >
 ----------------------------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       /   づ
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 6747a83 into main Sep 22, 2026
1 check passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the docs/ac1-cite-launcher-standard-praxis-deed branch September 22, 2026 14:32
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant