docs: remove OpenSSF Best Practices badge pointing at another project - #71
Conversation
The README displayed OpenSSF Best Practices project 8509. That project is not this one: $ curl -s https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/8509.json | jq -r .repo_url https://github.com/Isaiah0521/PA-updated-Weapon-Master Project 8509 is "PA-updated-Weapon-Master", an unrelated MS-PL adventure game by another author, and its badge level is "passing" -- so the badge asserted an earned certification this project never applied for. No OpenSSF Best Practices registration exists for this project or for the metadatastician / hyperpolymath owners (bestpractices.dev project search returns zero results for all four), so there is no correct id to swap in. The badge is removed rather than corrected. Registration is tracked separately; the badge may be restored only once `curl .../projects/<id>.json | jq -r .repo_url` names this repository. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YSq3UodR3CjsuAK5yoTzHF
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe README badge list no longer includes the OpenSSF Best Practices badge or its project link. ChangesREADME documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This documentation-only change removes an unrelated OpenSSF badge without affecting runtime behavior, and is ready to merge. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
What
Removes the OpenSSF Best Practices badge from
README.adoc. One line deleted, nothing else changed.Why
The badge pointed at project 8509, which is not this project:
Project 8509 is an unrelated MS-PL adventure game by another author. Its badge level is
passing, so the README was rendering a green earned-certification badge for acertification this project never applied for.
This was not a one-repo slip: all 46 occurrences of a bestpractices.dev project id across
the estate are the same id, 8509 — 24 tracked files in 14 repositories. There is no
"correct id" to substitute: a
bestpractices.devproject search returns zero results forhyperpolymath,metadatastician,paint-typeandstapeln. Nothing is registered.Why removal rather than correction
A badge that resolves is not the same as a badge that is yours. The test that matters is
jq -r .repo_urlnaming this repository, and no id satisfies it today. Genuine OpenSSFregistration is tracked separately; this badge may be restored only once that check passes.
Verification
git grep 8509returns nothing.git diff --numstatreads0 1 README.adoc— a pure deletion.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01YSq3UodR3CjsuAK5yoTzHF
Summary by CodeRabbit