5638, AB#614485, changed setup page so that assembly is not in the production group.

[insightworks007]

Replaced with PR #6071 to handle recent object renames.

Summary

Changed the setup page to separate the assembly setting into it's own group, out of the produciton group.
As clarified in teams, did not make changes to the wizard since there is a re-design of the wizard soon.
For a similar reason I did not add a link to start the wizard under the same presumption.

Work Item(s)

Fixes #5638 ( AB#614485 ).

[ChethanT]

'Quality Management Setup' looks like the following for a Essential user.

[ChethanT]

@insightworks007, setting the test generation rule for assembly output

and doing a post preview on Assembly Order gives a bad used experience. 'Quality Inspection Test' window opens behind preview window with empty values

Secondly, there are no 'Create Assembly Rule' nor 'Edit Assembly Rule' on the 'Quality Inspection Test Generation Rules' page

[ChethanT]

Page "Qlty. Prod. Gen. Rule Wizard", still hosts both production and assembly related controls.

[insightworks007]

@insightworks007, setting the test generation rule for assembly output

and doing a post preview on Assembly Order gives a bad used experience. 'Quality Inspection Test' window opens behind preview window with empty values

Secondly, there are no 'Create Assembly Rule' nor 'Edit Assembly Rule' on the 'Quality Inspection Test Generation Rules' page

@ChethanT The post preview issue is going to require someone from Microsoft to make a change in codeunit 900 "Assembly-Post" as a pre-requisite such that the "PreviewMode" variable is accessible via the posting event, or another way of making it accessible. This flag in that codeunit is set via SetPreviewMode, but there is no way to retrieve it during the Codeunit::"Assembly-Post", 'OnAfterPost' event.
Is there an other option with the existing codebase that I could use instead?

[insightworks007]

'Quality Management Setup' looks like the following for a Essential user.

@ChethanT This doesn't seem as simple as removing 'Assembly' from the application area on the field with assembly inside of the production group.
The only way I can find for the production group to be completely gone is to remove the "InstructionalText" from group(SettingsForProductionAutomation) and group(SettingsForProduction) in conjunction with also removing 'Assembly' from the field(ChooseCreateNewRule_Production) link.

Approach 1 is I could remove the instructional text for those groups in addition to removing the assembly application area in the one field.
Approach 2 is we just remove the assembly application area (the instructional text will still show).
Is there a 3rd option to consider?

[ChethanT]

@insightworks007, setting the test generation rule for assembly output
and doing a post preview on Assembly Order gives a bad used experience. 'Quality Inspection Test' window opens behind preview window with empty values
Secondly, there are no 'Create Assembly Rule' nor 'Edit Assembly Rule' on the 'Quality Inspection Test Generation Rules' page

@ChethanT The post preview issue is going to require someone from Microsoft to make a change in codeunit 900 "Assembly-Post" as a pre-requisite such that the "PreviewMode" variable is accessible via the posting event, or another way of making it accessible. This flag in that codeunit is set via SetPreviewMode, but there is no way to retrieve it during the Codeunit::"Assembly-Post", 'OnAfterPost' event. Is there an other option with the existing codebase that I could use instead?

I have opened bug AB#616805 to track this issue.

[ChethanT]

'Quality Management Setup' looks like the following for a Essential user.

@ChethanT This doesn't seem as simple as removing 'Assembly' from the application area on the field with assembly inside of the production group. The only way I can find for the production group to be completely gone is to remove the "InstructionalText" from group(SettingsForProductionAutomation) and group(SettingsForProduction) in conjunction with also removing 'Assembly' from the field(ChooseCreateNewRule_Production) link.

Approach 1 is I could remove the instructional text for those groups in addition to removing the assembly application area in the one field. Approach 2 is we just remove the assembly application area (the instructional text will still show). Is there a 3rd option to consider?

Apart from moving Assembly to its own group, you can also hide the Production by controlling the visibility of the group. This is how it would look for Essential user

[insightworks007]

Replaced with PR #6071 to handle recent object renames.