Restore deterministic review fixture coverage - #202
Merged
Jesper Schulz-Wedde (JesperSchulz) merged 1 commit intoSep 29, 2026
Merged
Jesper Schulz-Wedde (JesperSchulz) merged 1 commit into
Jesper Schulz-Wedde (JesperSchulz) merged 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Michael Dieringer (MichaelDieringer)
added a commit
to Curabis/BCQuality
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2026
…crosoft#198, microsoft#202) into document-distribution-batch Resolve evaluation/review-fixtures.json semantically: data-modeling articles list is the union of main's list and this PR's nine articles; everything else is taken from main unchanged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
coverageWaiversemptyRegistered articles
code-must-not-change-workdate,pictures-must-use-media-not-blob,table-design-must-match-bc-table-type-conventionsdefensive-vs-offensive-code-must-match-blast-radius,log-writes-must-survive-rollbackal-methods-limited-during-write-transactions,avoid-user-prompts-inside-transactionsexposed-objects-must-be-in-a-permission-setal-comments-must-not-restate-what-code-already-shows,pages-must-not-contain-business-logicasserterror-needs-expectederror-and-code,bcpt-scenarios-must-be-app-specific,commit-shared-test-fixture-inside-lazy-initialize,given-blocks-must-cover-full-precondition-chain,table-relation-test-exclude-known-invalid-relations-via-event,test-feature-scenario-tags,test-one-when-per-test,transactionmodel-attribute-governs-test-transactions,ui-test-codeunit-naming,use-assert-isfalse-not-asserterror-for-boolean-checkspage-design-must-match-bc-page-type-conventionsupgrade-tag-logic-must-not-nest-deeplyapi-page-least-privilege-write-accessRetrieval metadata
al-comments-must-not-restate-what-code-already-shows: addcredit-memo-routingfor the neutralized clean control whose comments are intentionally strippedpages-must-not-contain-business-logic: add the high-signalrec-modifyanti-pattern cuetest-feature-scenario-tags: addsubtype-test, matching every changed AL test codeunitExisting leaf skills already contain explicit high-signal routing rules for these articles, so no broader skill-routing changes were needed.
Validation
git diff --check: passed