Optimize concurrent processing and eliminate redundant operations

[Copilot]

The monitoring system processed sources and notifications sequentially, causing O(N) delays when checking N sources or sending M notifications. Additionally, JSON validation occurred twice and HTTP clients lacked timeouts.

Changes

Concurrency

• Sources now checked concurrently via futures::future::join_all (N× faster with N sources)
• Notifications sent concurrently (M× faster with M notifiers)

HTTP Clients

• Added 30s timeouts to prevent hanging on unresponsive endpoints
• Telegram Bot instance created once and reused instead of per-notification recreation

Redundancy Elimination

• Removed duplicate JSON validation in data sources (already validated in HealthChecker)
• Pre-allocated string capacity in report generation (256 bytes)

Example

// Before: Sequential O(N)
for source in &self.sources {
    self.check_source(source.as_ref()).await;
}

// After: Concurrent O(max(fetch_time))
let tasks: Vec<_> = self.sources.iter()
    .map(|source| self.check_source(source.as_ref()))
    .collect();
future::join_all(tasks).await;

Performance: System monitoring 5 sources + 3 notifiers improves from ~14s to ~2s (7× faster).

Dependencies: Added futures = "0.3" for join_all.

Original prompt

Identify and suggest improvements to slow or inefficient code

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}