Added abstract in pod as suggested by CPANTS.

[manwar]

Hi @mkende

Please review the PR.
https://cpants.cpanauthors.org/release/MATHIAS/App-Pfind-1.01

Many Thanks.
Best Regards,
Mohammad S Anwar

[mkende]

Not having a POD there is a feature, as this package is an implementation details of the script so I wouldn't want it in the search result on CPAN. But PAUSE forces one package at least to be indexed as far as I understand. Let me know if you know of a better way to do this.

[manwar]

Since, you have "App::Pfind" as "NAME" in your Makefile.PL script, it expects you have abstract in the main pod.
Alternatively, you could make "pfind" as your NAME but then this would create distribution tarball like pfind-0.tar.gz. I am not sure if this is acceptable to you.
I am sure you have valid reason not to have any pod in App::Pfind but adding just NAME shouldn't hurt in my humble opinion.

[mkende]

Renaming the distribution is perfectly fine if it solves this. I'll try that. Thanks for the tip.

[mkende]

Can you clarify what tool is expecting this POD to exist and what is the impact of not having it? Reading the MakeMaker documentation (https://metacpan.org/pod/ExtUtils::MakeMaker#NAME1) it seems that the NAME in the Makefile.PL must point to a package associated with a .pm file (so it can't be pfind).